these people should be ashamed of themselves and scientific american should be ashamed for publishing them. writing that they asked GPT-3 for consent is especially embarrassing.
fwiw some other people actually did this years ago and did get at least one neural-network-authored paper past “peer review” and published; this says a lot more about the peer review process than it says about neural networks.
these people should be ashamed of themselves and scientific american should be ashamed for publishing them. writing that they asked GPT-3 for consent is especially embarrassing.
they are contributing to this problem: https://lemmy.ml/post/343852
fwiw some other people actually did this years ago and did get at least one neural-network-authored paper past “peer review” and published; this says a lot more about the peer review process than it says about neural networks.
🥱