DuckDuckGo sheds light on Google's privacy claims and urges internet users to ditch Chrome.
DDG isn’t NEARLY as private as it should be, mind you. But IMO their points here are still valid.
You must log in or register to comment.
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don’t promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
- 0 users online
- 1 user / day
- 1 user / week
- 1 user / month
- 98 users / 6 months
- 0 subscribers
- 298 Posts
- 954 Comments
- Modlog
DDG is not private and they have censorship.
yeah i think this is deliberate obfuscation of their own very recent issue with privacy wrt bing trackers that a security researcher blew the whistle on.
Firefox+SearX is the answer.
Hardened Ficefox and a locally selfhosted SearX instance. 🧐
Hardened Ungoogled Chromium and a self hosted SearX instance for me!
But the default behaviour of self hosted searx is to expose the server’s IP to the actual search engines, do you use VPN or something at the server side?