There was a “concerning trend of violence targeted at political figures, religious or community groups”, as demonstrated by the killing of the former minister and Reform UK spokesperson Anne Widdecombe.
It was right there in the article. And it’s “Anne”, which you would have got right if you gave a shit about her life and weren’t just using it to score political points.
Classy.
He got Burnham elected
My guess is that it descended from “rascal”, or is closely related. I know a lot of French and some Spanish and Italian, and I don’t think “rascal” appears in those languages, so it can’t come from Latin/Greek. But, it doesn’t sound Anglo Saxon or Germanic, so I reckon it might be Shakespearian, he introduced loads of new words like this.
Edit: I have just googled, I was mostly wrong. “Rascal” comes from Latin through old French, then “rapscallion” evolved in English in the 17th century to be able to add spoken emphasis. It’s just easier to contemptuously spit “you rapscallion” than “you rascal”.
I don’t know where you found that first quote, they’re certainly not my words. Buddy.
I’ve also explained how it is false. I can only explain it to you; I can’t understand it for you. Good luck mate.
Yes, it is.
You’re not being down voted by idiots. You’re being down voted by people who have learned how logic works. Maybe you could, too? It takes minutes/hours.
Again; it is not possible to completely exclude the potential of them being innocent. That is literally beyond the wit of man.
The words you’re using have rules. I don’t mean this in an adversarial way, but you are wrong.
Irrefutable evidence does not prove the claim, it just proves that you can’t refute the evidence. Video evidence can be misleading or fake. DNA evidence needs context to prove anything.
Anyway, like I say, these things have rules. The only things in the entire human domain that can be positively proved are mathematical statements. This is why gravity remains a theory, even after 350 years. One single counterexample disproves it. There are numerous examples of this happening in the context of the death penalty, where a jury was so convinced of guilt they condemned someone who was later executed, then, later still, new information emerged which proved them to be innocent.
Just by the pure first-principles of logic, the death sentence is a bad idea.
That reason is cowardice, and it’s why the far right continue to do so well. Appeasement does not work. “The left has to offer an alternative” is what we’ve been screaming throughout Starmer’s premiership, and now we’re getting it.
You say that with certainty; we have to try and negotiate reentry to see which terms we would be offered. Nobody knows.
That’s not certain. At this point it’s just used as a means to dissuade UK citizens from wanting back into the EU.
If we get to a point where the EU will only let us rejoin if we change to the euro (an unlikely scenario) then that is the time to consider whether it’s worth it. Not now.
It has to be, I suppose. This girl is younger than the youngest male grandmaster, so obviously it would be unfair on the men to force them to compete against women.
I bought an EV two years ago. Second hand obviously because I’m not rich. It was eight years old. Within two months it stopped working, the battery was fried. There wasn’t a mechanic in a 20-mile radius who would agree to work on it. Even the manufacturer garage just quoted a battery replacement which was more than the price of the vehicle. I was left with no car and the biggest debt I’ve ever had.
I’ve got an ICE car now, because when it breaks, it can be fixed.
Those cute sentient animals would eat us too if they were sapient. And we tasted good.
I will look into this, thank you!
Not having tens of thousands to spend on storage is a bit of a blocker in my case.
Whoever they are, I doubt they like themselves very much.
It is. They tend to hide this until the hard sell, but here’s a little bit of info that I could find: https://www.bootshearingcare.com/hearing-aids/hearing-aid-prices/
There’s more info that’s only revealed after your second hearing test, when they put the “platinum plus” software driven device on your ears, then reveal the pricing in a handily confusing leaflet. It’s similar at Specsavers where I went after, thinking “is this real? Surely they’re not all like this”
It’s a shame to see someone for whom words and context are an integral part of their job failing to understand both.
It’s hard to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he’s just missed the point because he’s stupid or negligent.