“They want people like me to not exist” is not a “general stance.”

No, that is not a general statement. “Someone that wants some group of people to not exist” is the general statement, and I belong to some group of people. Anything that applies to the general statement also applies to the specific one. I’m not about to list all groups of people in existence, but if you want to play the game where you name someone and I tell you whether or not the rule applies, I’m happy to play along.

Do you mean lemmyers? People with usernames that start with H?

Yes to all of the above, as long as they don’t infringe on anyone else’s right to live.

Don’t pretend that because you’re trying to conflate this with math that you’re somehow correct or logical.

Logic is math. Do you disagree with the comparison?

We have streets here that become pedestrian streets during the summer. During those times, delivery trucks come early in the morning while the streets are nearly empty and they stop right in front of the business they’re delivering to. The rest of the year, they have to stop on the side streets because that’s the only place where they don’t block car traffic. They have to wheel everything much further and leave one thing or another unattended while doing so.

I’m speaking in generalities because it’s a very general stance.

What you’re doing is the equivalent of going to someone who says x+x=2x and and claiming they must not know what they’re saying because they’re not telling you what exact value x is.

You generally learn of people’s opinions when they tell you their opinions. Not that this is relevant in this discussion. The point is that targeting people who hold such opinions is what it means to “treat the symptoms” in this context. Figuring out who holds such opinions is a different matter.

How is my exact identity relevant? Do you think it’s more acceptable to get rid of one group of people versus another? As long as they don’t infringe on other people’s right to live, everyone should have an equal right to live their life.

I don’t know how much clearer that can be. Their opinion is that I shouldn’t exist. Or that I should die. Or that we should move towards a world where people like me don’t exist.

I don’t see what my identity has to do with this. Whether I’m a cis-het white male or bipoc gay trans, those opinions are equally problematic.

• Literally by holding the opinion that people like myself shouldn’t exist
• Supporting people who are actively killing people like myself
• Encouraging others to incite violence towards us
• Supporting policy that would kill many of us

This keeps happening on Lemmy. What front end did you use to post this comment?

Specifically those who disagree with my right to live. If you disagree on any other front, there’s no reason for violence.

But it does mean that it’s all accounted for. Rest time is allocated time. Buffer time is allocated time.

How’s that relevant here? We’re talking about jobs, not homes. I’m comparing the Soviet job situation to some present day homelessness situations.

I imagine it’s the same problem as how some places today are making homelessness illegal without providing the means for everyone to get a home.

So like, just brush your teeth again? What else do people normally do in the morning besides eating?

Why is this a Google link?

I just hold my breath until the feeling goes away.

https://lemmy.ca/post/34765676

Unfortunate. I’ve been making good use of it. I thought this was intentional, considering that you can’t actually use the spawner while it’s blocked off.

The way it seems to work in Canada is that the government decides on a set of topics they want to fund that are fairly high level, and as long as your work falls in one of those categories, the grant gets approved. So the government doesn’t choose the specific drug to study. They choose which medical condition we want to try to treat, then they let the PIs tell them what they want to do and how it relates to those priorities.

Every time you hear that they developed a drug that selectively kills cancer cells in vitro, that’s an incremental step. When you hear that someone successfully cured a specific type of cancer in rats, that’s an incremental step.

The other potential explanation is that it’s because the speed task increases in difficulty as you get better at it. I’m hoping that’s the real reason.

I don’t think lack of intelligence is the reason most people are fine with eating animal meat and not human babies. It’s usually that humans just value animal lives less than that of other humans.