Is important to have options from a moral compass such as only EA CEO’s can be.

    • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      It confuses me how this is a monopoly.

      I keep hearing people call it that, but it doesn’t fit the definition as I understand it.

      I’m not saying this much consolidation is a good thing, don’t misunderstand, I just don’t think it’s reached monopoly levels.

      • tarsn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Doesn’t have to be a monopoly to be shit, oligopolies are crap for consumers too

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This. Seeing 1-2, maybe 3 major players in many industries now. “No monopolies here” may be true, but misses the point that the outcome is the same. This new conglomerate has just that much more capability to fuck over the little guy.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s just it, it’s not a monopoly yet. But it’s not as far off as you’d like to think. Just look at where the biggest money is in the market then look at who’s attached to who. When you consider just how big of a third-party power Activision was in the industry and see it get swallowed up by a first party company, it’s terrifying and the fact that even governments had their eyes on this merger should be telling. Comparatively, take a look at how slow they were to even look they they were doing something about all the rampant child gambling that is “surprise mechanics”. Personally, I don’t care for the companies that were bought so I won’t be missing out and I’m on PC so if a rare diamond pops up, I still won’t be in the dark but think about one of the most anti-consumer practices that already goes on in the market; exclusivity. Yeah, they’ve said they aren’t going to make CoD exclusive but corporations tend to lie in their favor - im not going to pretend Sony and Nintendo aren’t just as bad, I really wish they’d all cut that crap out but here we are. But when one of the biggest powers suddenly buys another of the biggest slices of the market, suddenly the market becomes imbalanced. MS already has both Xbox and Windows in regards to platforms. If we’re only looking at CoD, then Nintendo isn’t effected but Sony gets to enjoy a lot of those CoD players too. For now, Sony will be having to pay their competition for the games and in the long term might not even have that choice and is how a large power in a market begins to erode away before vanishing. Long term, it turns into an oligopoly - look how well that’s gone for the North American telecommunications market and tell me how good one of those is before it can even become a monopoly.

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    Funny thing is that Activision-Blizzard was so bad that many people figured a Microsoft takeover probably couldn’t make it worse…

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s great for EA, because they can probably buy another publisher and point to being smaller than Microsoft.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    He saw the “Please drink verification can” greentext and thought “Hey that’s a pretty good idea!”.