• Skies5394@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s basically just their Outlook web app. It offers no extra function, and breaks a LOT of old functionality.

    There’s a registry key to turn off the button.

    • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a registry key to turn off the button.

      Of course it’s a registry key.

        • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t even need the damn button. Yesterday while playing some fullscreen game with critical network usage (CSGO) my windows 10 with edited group policies and registry keys to block updates just switched to the outlook from the old mail program and ran it in the foreground (behind the game).

          Microsoft doesn’t give a fuck about the user consent, the settings for updates, settings for game focus, out-of-the-way advanced user controls etc. These settings don’t even need to be defaulted without consent via updates, it seems they outright don’t work.

          • nihth@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Had a similar issue where my computer (w10) would restart while I was away and update my gpu driver which would crash regularly. There’s two different places in windows where you can disable this, one in general and one for specifically the device. None of them worked. Basically was forced to do the whole restart to safe mode -> destroy driver -> restart -> install driver -> restart every day. What solved it was a gpo but at that point I was so fed up I ended up switching to Linux

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oof. If you aren’t using them, you can uninstall the default included MS Store Apps with PowerShell. Could have saved you some trouble.

            I was going to say I had a similar setup and didn’t get that update, but I remembered I had uninstalled the mail app.

      • kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, it’s intended for companies, so for them there’s InTune policies or is GPOs. For us plebs, we just have to not press the button.

        • Caaaaarrrrlll@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          GPOs

          Group policy can be modified by a laymen by launching gpedit.msc from Super+R or the start menu.

            • kite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not on Home edition

              You can do it on home. Takes a lot of googling and monkeying around, but I did it on my father’s computer years ago.

    • adavis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Android app has done this for years too.

      After connecting my (non Microsoft) email account to the Outlook Android app I noticed the login location was geolocated in the USA… I live in Australia.

      Unfortunately there’s no way to turn it off.

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, duh!!

    It’s a web version wrapped in some god-awful semi-native wrapper. Everything the app does is stored on the server. So, yes, like gmail, if you give it access to another IMAP account, the password is stored on the server BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS.

    This isn’t a scandal. It shouldn’t be news.

    The bigger discussion why are we pretending a server driven mail client is local?

    • thomask@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the discussion. Microsoft is pretending by making it the upgrade path for two products which actually are local, and hoping users won’t notice.

      • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        At work I’ve been trying to use the new Outlook but the biggest gripe (other than this new news) is that it’s once again, a fucking Electron app and a lot of features have been cut.

        I work at an MSP and people have mistakenly changed to the new Outlook, and then find things like their local mail rules stop working (because it doesn’t support those anymore), their custom accounting software that would compose an email in Outlook straight up won’t do that with new Outlook, for businesses it’s going to wreak havoc if Microsoft just force updates everyone.

        • datavoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least m365 outlook / outlook 2016 counts as a different product as far as I’m aware, don’t think updating Mail will affect the real outlook

  • kapnova9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People complain about Apple a lot but I think Microsoft is a much more annoying company and it is very difficult to avoid their products/services. Same with google

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s definitely things to dislike about Apple, but a lot of the complaining just feels like some childish console war.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, if you only listen to and care about such petulant complaining.

        There are actual gripes to be had that have broader implications.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      the recent revamp of thunderbird is really good.

      em client (commercial product, but free for some–2 mail accounts, home use only) is also a solid choice.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally disliked emclient and went back to outlook.
        Maybe I’ll consider Thunderbird in the future now that it looks modern.
        Already using Firefox.

        • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why did you dislike eM Client?

          I’ve been looking at it recently because I’m currently using Mailbird. In recent weeks they told us that support for their current client will stop in 12 months time and we need to get on their latest client, which they want a one off payment AND an annual subscription. What greedy ducks.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Some points I remember from the time I ditched it (around 3-5 years ago). They may changed them:

            • The payment was linked to the version. Wanna get a new major version = pay for the new license. It’s like buying the MS 20xx package but in that case you only have the single client instead of a whole suite. (Ignoring the whole price difference)
            • Client UI wasnt my cup of tea
            • Multi account didnt feel as comfortable as it does feel on outlook.
            • Had some issues connecting my Gmail accounts and keeping them connected. Not aware of any issues with outlook
            • Afaik the database went bad at some point. Maybe imisremember it though

            In essence, most issues were personal. Try it for yourself. Maybe the newer version suits you more than me!

            Update: Seems like I either misremember it or I bought a license because of a feature (at the time). Anyway: They appear to have changed the licensing for home use to be free and only corporate users need to pay.

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    not just login credentials, but all your mail, too, even if you aren’t using a microsoft-hosted mail account.

  • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t get why people still use Microsoft services. How many data privacy scandals do we need, so they understand? Or do they still not care?

      • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In taking about personal email. I also use outlook at work because I’m forced to, but I would never let these bastards touch my private Mails.

    • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because my line of work means I working corporations, and they ALWAYS run everything on the big names, Microsoft and Oracle.

      At home, I have choice. At work, I must swallow.

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re working with clients that requires you to have security certifications it can be a real pain in the ass to certify your setup for everything vs just using the 365 stack.

          • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True. Hate it when people want the cert instead of actual security. But I know how the world ticks. Corporate usually doesn’t give you a choice.

      • WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And at work I don’t really care. It’s not my data they are “looking” at. It’s my employers.

        I guess they won’t lose any corporate customers over this. The pure shit that it outlooks hasn’t scared anyone away yet.

        I tried to delete ~7k emails today. I had to kill the process since it stopped responding. Wtf?

      • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s honestly pretty expensive compared to the alternatives. If you compare a business setup with windows plus office etc plus the support fee you can get all of that for free plus a much lower support fee from a variety of independent companies with Linux and libreoffice. The typical office worker really doesn’t need the few corner cases where MS office maybe has an advantage. Honestly for a business I would even go with Google tools. Same data privacy issues, but at least the product works great. MS office in the cloud is hot garbage.

          • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            What else would I mention? Some doesn’t have an office suite and figure is the only other competitor.

        • Evotech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          imnate compatibility with other organisations is a huge selling point.

          For companies at a certain scale / within a certain field I don’t think it’s even up for discussion.

      • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but at least Google offers a good search engine while sniffing all your data. Microsoft products are usually hot garbage, sniff your data and then loose it. Also what is the Amazon index?

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a government job (shocking to me still) and everything is on Exchange and 365. I don’t know why, other than “nobody ever got fired for recommending IBM.”

  • RocketBoots@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish I was a good enough dev to write a swift keys replacement. There’s AnySoftKeyboard available, and they’re doing an amazing job with swipe input which I prefer, but there’s only so much one person can do.

  • WikIBayer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yet another reason to use Thunderbird or Evolution. There must finally be mobile devices with Linux that are usable.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both of those are usable but that’s about it. I use Evolution because it integrates with online accounts service well and I don’t have to mine for contacts, but overall it’s a sorry state of email clients in Linux world. Geary had nice ideas for a while, but it’s also dreadfully optimized and development has kind of stopped.

      It’s also not such an easy to problem to solve either. Whole Gnome ecosystem got a lot better with new and modern applications with sleek designs, but email clients remain a pain in the ass.

  • brothershamus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just outrageous that we’re in 202-almost-4 and mail is still in use the way it is.

    Seriously, the fix has been available for almost 30 years, no one has been able - or willing - to popularize it. Hmmm.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not one of them seem to be major and inherent to the technology. Size limits are arbitrary. Privacy concerns can be addressed with the likes of encryption. Email fatigue is a ridiculous reason to gripe about.

          Address spoofing is probably the most annoying but could be addressed my making the actual email the header. So that’s an implementation issue.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Size limits aren’t arbitrary. Email format translates attachments to ASCII which makes them larger and harder to process. Mail servers need to scan and handle messages which means they will need to impose limits to be able to work well. Back in the day when Gmail didn’t it quickly started being abused by people using it as online storage.

            Encryption is difficult to implement with a system that performs multi-point handoff, and works against some use cases like corporate use where you want virus scanning.

            Try to design an alternative email system and you’ll see how quickly you start losing features that make it interesting and useful. For example, for all its faults email is very user-centric and portable, you can easily take your domain and move your addresses to a different provider. How many other communication services can you say that about?

  • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m seeing many people recommend Thunderbird. Let me enlightnen you.

    I personally never trust any software that is not secure and private by default. Mozilla Corp is a for-profit corporation that makes nearly a Billion dollars in cooperation with Google monetizing data about your life. Thunderbird is Mozilla and if you setup with the Wizard, it already got the basics about your email life even if you disable it later.

    Thunderbird Not Private by Default

    • Sends all interactions with it to Mozilla
      • Whether calendar is in use
      • How many filters you have
      • How many email accounts you have
    • Computer/Device Information including hardware configuration
      • Operating system
      • IP address is logged

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/thunderbird-telemetry

    Disabling Telemetry

    1. Click the menu button Menu Button and select Settings.
    2. Select the Privacy & Security panel.
    3. Scroll to the Thunderbird Data Collection and Use section.
    4. Deselect the Allow Thunderbird to send technical and interaction data to Mozilla checkbox.

    Thunderbird Bad Security Practice of using a Primary Password

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/protect-your-thunderbird-passwords-primary-password

    17 Criticial or High Vulnerabilies this year alone

    Conclusion

    If email security and privacy means a lot to you, or even computer security and privacy, your best options are to use BSD/UNIX/Void/Alpine and Claws-Mail. That is just the way the cookie crumbles in 2023.

      • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s true that Mozilla does collect telemetry and that Mozilla Corp is for profit, however Mozilla Corp is owned by Mozilla Foundation. That ownership structure is either a way to get around limitations on non profits, or its an opportunity for the Foundation to directly influence the Corp to be better.

        However, I’ll still use Firefox/Thunderbird because: Usage stats such as number of accounts or filters is in no way comparable to my username and password. One is basic metadata and stats, the other is a massive risk. You can opt out of the telemetry, the only way to opt out of sharing your password is to not use the new Outlook.

        I take a more pragmatic approach to privacy based on my trust. I understand the value of telemetry, but change it depending on the company. Big Tech I have less trust in, Mozilla, while they have issues, are on average far better for privacy vs big tech.

        As a developer, I understand the value of telemetry and the risks that come with collecting any data. I pick Firefox because it challenges the homogeney of Google’s influence and it looks like I’m going to pick Thunderbird because I’ haven’t seen a better option.

        • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whoa, 9 upvotes instantly, then a block of 11 downvotes, then another block of 8 downvotes, and then a challenger reply, very interesting! Refute this guy he says! It’s hard when someone challenges long held viewpoints, I get that. I live and breath security for decades now, there is nothing to refute, I left those parts out.

          I’m choosing to repond here because this is a typical Big-Tech marketing speak viewpoint, that somehow Mozilla is to be trusted, that Mozilla isn’t Big Tech. Well, it obviously is Big Tech to the tune of almost a Billion, what! The way they hide that massive Mozilla Corp money behind a non-profit, sketchy!

          Right there you should not trust them

          Even though you can opt-out of the Telemetry, which can be useful if done correctly, the majority of the most valuable data about your digital life is already collected when you set it up. Opting out only disables further collection.

          Mozilla is a significant part of increasing Google’s hegemony if you read the article, you have it backwards! The Internet Data search et al. valuation is vastly superior [value] to browser valuation or market share to which Firefox is only something like 7%.

          Lastly going with Thunderbird because it’s the least bad is a terrible choice to have to make, isn’t it? Do I have that wrong? Even if you are on Windows, you can determine to not play the least-bad game of Big-Tech selling the least amount of details about your life and just run your email somewhere else, even in a VM.

          I’m here for people power and not Mega-Corp power. I’m writing this at the keyboard right now willing to get flack and downvotes, for you. I gave you the viable option, Claws-Mail.

          Some may say yeah, but BSD/Linux Claws-Mail is not a shiny UX experience and those shinies are worth sale of my digital identity/me. How Gollum of you!

          Yeah, I said it Lemmy, I said it! Don’t sell yourself for free because it’s easier or “more intuitive” or “works better”!

          • Skies5394@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Complaining about downvotes is a sure fire way to get more downvotes.

            But I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the information you’re presenting, so much as the way you’re presenting it.

            There’s tons of emotion around news and facts these days and people just want it cut straight without the fat. Don’t tell us how to feel, or why we should feel that way, tell us what the facts are and we’re grown ups, we’ll put our big people clothes on and make up how we feel about it on our own.

            Any emotion you put into it is likely to undo any good points you may have made. There’s a time for that, this isn’t it.

            • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah, this post, it was bound to happen. Thing is I know all the internet social rules. I was on a baud modems and Netscape Navigator. I’m an expert at Psychology and many other things.

              Let me condense your rules. No judgement, no emotion, no against-the-grain, otherwise I will accumulate anonymous/secret peer pressure ostracizing. Trust me I know, any high schooler will tell you these rules. However, what does that system sound like it will conclude in, a communication expectation of no judgement, no emotion, no singular criticism?

              I’m choosing not to play by those rules because they don’t improve the human condition which is what I’m after, even if it’s only 1 person. Judgement is needed, shame is needed, they’re aren’t many grown-ups as you say, they just think they are, otherwise the state of technology and the world would not be so dismal and disasterous right now with America being the fattest and most depressed it’s ever been. Harsh words, but true.

              You might say who am I to do that? There are many responses I can give, but perhaps the best one is, that I’m anyone, someone, willing to give voice, passion, and a well-thought out and logical counter to the current group-think where people pimp themselves out to Google and Mozilla.

              You also mistake me. I didn’t post about downvotes to be contrarion against the crowd, a well known pyschological phenomena, but to hint at, make an inference to, that it was unnatural, algorithmic, let’s say.

              • Skies5394@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you get carte blanche to be insufferable because you consider yourself to be a holier than thou messenger with self-assigned credentials?

                • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Pretty much my conclusion. Their writing style is completely off-putting and even if they have good points, I’m not going to endure their attitude to try to get to them anymore.

                  I’ve been online just at long, if not longer than them, and their “type” is nothing new. Nor is the solution: smiles and wave, boys, smile and wave.

                • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A spiteful response that misses every mark while proving my point. Thanks for the extra credit.

          • legoshark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate your informative post. I almost down voted it for the statement that Mozilla is big tech, but you do have a valid point that they are on Google’s leash. I wish it weren’t that way and that they were self-sustaining, but it is what it is. In my mind, they are better than the big tech companies because of their non-profit ownership, but non-profits can be corrupted. I’m still going to continue using Firefox though since the web desperately needs browser competition and it’s the only competition in town =)

      • thomask@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I’m glad they highlighted the telemetry. I went through the local report about what’s included and while it’s not an upsetting level of detail, it’s more comprehensive than I would have opted in to if asked.

        Still, as sibling points out it’s in a completely different league from slurping up your IMAP creds, something which has always been local-only data. This is the second time I know of recently where MS has trampled on this kind of local-only expectation - the other was Edge defaulting to sending the contents of textboxes you’re filling out on webpages to the MS cloud for spelling and grammar checks. Thunderbird is still a sound recommendation, and unlike Microsoft, I trust that if I uncheck the telemetry box they’re not going to try to get me some other way.

    • Saki@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thunderbird doesn’t passphrase-protect your PGP key. Though you can set a general password… For something less important, its OpenPGP may be convenient, given that if you send/receive email normally, there is metadata problem anyway. But if you need to play it safe, you may want to use gpg offline and paste ascii.

      Increasingly more and more “phoning home” is not exactly comfortable, either: thunderbird-settings.thunderbird(.)net location.services.mozilla(.)com addons.thunderbird(.)net versioncheck.addons.thunderbird(.)net services.addons.thunderbird(.)net, etc. Perhaps people today, both users and developers, feel something like this is normal, because things were already more or less like this when they were born.

      Re: Micro$oft - It might be that after raped by Google, the society has been desensitized and stopped feeling anything about “minor details.” Why worrying now? You use a Windows 10 passport account (what is it called?) just to log on to “your own” computer and also a Gmail account anyway, right? So bad news is, your privacy is almost zero already.