Not caramel; butterscotch. That stuff can be made to harden the same way the chocolate coating does.

Even the vanilla versions of those things have a chocolate shell coating on the top, not just inside the cone. You would’ve known what it was about way before you got to that last part.

(If that isn’t true for the ones you buy, I want to know what weird, obscure brand you’re talking about.)

To be fair, though, coating the cone with some other flavor (butterscotch, maybe) could be a neat idea.

I guess the qualifier for me is, is the law something that’s in place for public good? If so, it should be enforced.

That’s supposed to be the case for every law.

Local deliveries should be happening in electric vehicles.

Including cargo bikes, not only electric box trucks.

I thought they were for preventing people from being able to see into the hatchback area without having to cut the cargo capacity in half with a parcel shelf.

I want all my programs all in one place, and all in the start menu, listed alphabetically. I want a center where I can push a button to update them, or mod them, or uninstall them, or even open them (if for some reason the start menu wasn’t working for some reason). I want it all in one centralized manager app. Call it whatever the fuck you want. But it should handle wine exe installs, flatpaks, sudo apt-get install, AppImages, and…sigh, yes, even snaps. If you can install it, this manager should handle it, including being able to click a checkbox that says “add to start menu”. You can uncheck it if for some reason you DON’T want a program on your start menu, but it should give you the option.

Should it also handle RPM, pkgtool, pkgsrc, nixpkg, Portage, Homebrew, PyPI, NPM, CPAM, CLTN, CTAN, .jar, and software installed from source via ./configure; make; make install?

On the other hand, instead of putting all the responsibility on the GNOME shell devs (and the devs of every other application launcher) to support every software packaging format under the sun, maybe it would be better to put the responsibility on the people packaging each application to conform to the Freedesktop.org desktop entry specification.

I’m not saying your complaint isn’t valid, BTW. Linux’s lack of a central authority to dictate how things should work does inherently cause some problems that we basically just have to suck up and accept in the name of freedom.

But the point I’m trying to make is that, while Linux may not do something the way you would expect coming from Windows, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t [try to] solve the problem in a different way. The more you can let go of your Windows-familiarity-based “intuition” of how things should work, the better off you’ll be.

(Speaking of which: one reason you can’t find the equivalent of “Program Files” is that the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard collates programs’ files by type—executables go in bin, configuration files go in etc, and so on—instead of collating per application with all of its files together in a single directory. This has advantages and disadvantages that you may or may not care about, but one design isn’t necessarily clearly superior to the other in all cases.)

deleted by creator

Personally, I recommend quitting Windows cold-turkey and not dual-booting at all. If a game genuinely doesn’t work without dual-booting, you don’t need it. No game is so important that it’s worth compromising your security, privacy, and property rights over.

Still looks better in comparison! 🙃

Yeah, this would be a stupid plan based on a defective understanding of how LLMs work even before taking the blatant ulterior motives into account.

Musk’s fascist ass.

Your question is like asking how to convert a cake into flour, sugar, milk, butter and (unbroken!) eggs.

“This episode was badly written!”

The Princess Bride, obviously!

But Russia thinks it’s an empire and acts accordingly, reality be damned.

You own your individual copy of the game software, end of. It doesn’t fucking matter if it’s on a disc or a digital download.

It’s not ever true. It is always a lie pushed by copyright-maximalist shysters who hope the public is too cowed to call them on their bullshit.

Every place that actually gives a shit about property rights.

I’m certainly not denying that actual car terrorism is a thing now, in the 2020s. But that’s very different than claiming it was being described in a comic from almost a hundred years ago, or claiming that the single-direction barricade depicted was intended to be a countermeasure for it (let alone an effective one).

Please explain how decorating the Brandenburg gate in pride flags supports genocide.

Be specific.