Fediverse hot takes:

  1. The only true client is the browser.

  2. Microblogging be damned.

  3. it’s the instances/servers that are federated, not the users (ie us) … and damn that too.

@fediverse

#fediverse

  • maegul@hachyderm.ioOP
    0·
    2 years ago

    @fediverse
    7) In the aggregate, #Mastodon / #fediverse are simply unintuitive.

    Add up all of the design missteps or confusions (which happen), mixed and confusing but often strongly felt cultural standards, lacking or hard-to-find documentation or explanations, and, federation strangeness/quirkiness … and you get a platform that crosses past the reasonably intuitive line.

    It’s reparable, but probably not easily so.

    • maegul@hachyderm.ioOP
      0·
      2 years ago

      @fediverse
      8) The ideal fediverse is (?):

      1. Everyone is on single-user instances with much personal control (hosted by one of many services).
      2. People congregate in various “platforms as communities”, which is where the real moderating and community management happens.
      3. A variety of software and platform options exist for both the user-instances and community platforms.

      The flaw of the #fediverse is that it conflates hosting and community services (ie, 1 & 2) and so underperforms at both.

      • maegul@hachyderm.ioOP
        0·
        2 years ago

        @fediverse
        9) Like #Twitter and #BlueSky, the fediverse also likely has had its well poisoned … by “tech libertarianism”.

        Twitter: “Nazi bar”, BlueSky: “Crypto scam”. Fediverse: “tech libertarianism fanatics”.

        You may disagree, but others, perhaps many (?) see it that way and feel that the virtues of a properly designed and managed centralised social media are superior to chaotic volunteer-run decentralisation.

        Maybe we should be forced to “work it all out together in the public square”?