• trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Any woman who can do even remotely well in the military can do any other job for vastly superior pay and far more control of their lives.

    Unless you’re going to push a neutral requirement for service of both sexes, no amount of bitching or complaining will ever increase the number of women in the military because they don’t have to sacrifice their health and welfare for a paycheque anywhere near as hard, it’s an option to them and not one they would willingly take when any other job that requires the same performance standard can pay more with better time and more respect than the military.

    Pretending otherwise is intellectually dishonest or the position of someone who has never performed military service and likely never will.

    It’s not a male dominated occupation because men inherently prefer destroying their bodies and minds with overexposure to violence and extreme physical labour with one of the highest rates of injury and death just from the training alone, it’s because it’s a job easily accessible to middle or lower educated individuals that can provide an effective specialization and education that could be applied in a civilian setting.

    A male and female with the same education and physical fitness standard have drastically different occupation opportunities at the mid to low end of the education spectrum, and women tend to have higher level opportunities across the board, specifically ones which do not destroy them.

    This is the educated opinion of a woman who’s done close to a decade of grunt service in the military and another decade in the military industrial complex.

    • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Let’s say there’s a pair of new parents, and that they don’t have family support. This is already a common reality for many new families.

      Let’s say that now there’s a mandated enlistment because of a war. Which parent will go? Will they play rock paper scissors, or will they have to trust the government to randonly decide for them? Is it ethical for the government to decide who goes? Is it ethical for them to make new parents make that choice?

      If they’re both going, who will care for the young child? I certainly wouldn’t trust strangers to watch babies en masse if the parents would be gone for a very long time at minimum.

      Maybe mandated enlistment isn’t where it’s at, and maybe we should also be making sure that we’re giving people a reason to want to fight for their country again. Laws against fleeing will only do so much when we have such a large planet.

      Do you do a better job when you’re forced to do something, or do you do a better job when you’re passionate about something?

      • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You realize that instead of actually addressing anything that mattered in my statement you focused exclusively on an example that would not function from presentation?

        Why do you think volunteer armies are superior to conscripted armies?

        Can you read through what I wrote please.