Do you need a domain name if you are hosting a Lemmy instance, or will it work fine with just an ip-address + port (e.g. <username>@<ip-address>:<port>)?

    • fuser@quex.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I just learned something, but what does “control” the IP mean? If they are only validating a single address via http then presumably you could just use an Amazon elastic IP as long as it resolves. I doubt that letsencrypt will support that but I would be interested to know. If they do then yeah, you could presumably set up the instance using the IP as the name, but I don’t know why you would want to. Apart from the fact that it would be hard to remember, could change at some point, screwing things up, it might work. I suggest OP do the necessary and report back accordingly.

      • godless@latte.isnot.coffee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        but what does “control” the IP mean

        I believe that means you must be registered as the owner with the RIPE or whichever authority is in charge of administrating IP ranges, so that would also negate the point of chaining IP addresses, since that would indeed be a permanent fixture.

        For AWS it should then only work if Amazon Inc. is the applicant for the SSL cert., not merely a user. So it’s a quite theoretical application at best.

        • fuser@quex.cc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          yes, there had to be catch, although the guy in this letsencrypt support thread is a senior Letsencrypt engineer and he seems to be saying it is possible - although letsencrypt doesn’t support it. I do think you’d have to show a bit more to the issuer to prove ownership than an http acme challenge though.

          • Sergey Kozharinov@lem.serkozh.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t make a lot of sense for LetsEncrypt to spend time adding support for such certs, since both a domain name and a cert from another CA are cheaper than buying an IPv4 block