• the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Provide to me a copy/paste definition of “false premise” so i know you know more fallacies than “strawman” and “ad hominem”. If i feel you learned something today ill call our little tete a tete a win.

    (That was ad-hominem)

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t need to provide you with shit. Look at you, expecting to get someone else’s effort and time for free again. Thanks for proving you’re dishonest.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Youre getting angry now i think. Whatever fruit this may have borne has withered. Last salvo and ill be finished:

        I honestly want you to read about false premise, and i (selfishly) want proof that you have bettered yourself. If you don’t want to (and frankly, i don’t blame you) then would you at least pinky swear you’ll read it later?

        (Spoiler: ‘false premises’ don’t necessarily invalidate an argument, just make the ground is on shakier. ) There’s a lot to read, and a lot to learn. Here, i’ll link it. It’s real. Go check it out.

        Believe it or not, reading thru the definition will make you better at defending this point in the future. Youre gonna all the tools available if youre going with this stance, and that’s what you want, right? You’re not just coming on this forum to run your mouth, right? Your comments have purpose, yes? You will need tools to convince, and you are in dire need of a toolbox

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not angry. I haven’t even thought about what you said before, even after you just mentioned it.

          I’m not doing anything you ask me to because I know what a false premise is, I know what ad hominem is, and I know what a straw man is. You haven’t actually provided any kind of argument against what I said so I know you’re not being honest. Since you’re not willing to be honest, there is no point in continuing discussion with you.

          • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not angry. I haven’t even thought about what you said before, even after you just mentioned it.

            This might be the finest, most delicious dessert ive ever eaten

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Again, I don’t care. You’re still starving.

                Ha, This was a lot of keystrokes to not care. And yes, this is delicious dessert after my morning coffee.

                  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Not really. I’m a fast typer. Still don’t care.

                    Not sure what is funnier, that you think this is a counterpoint or that you care that people think you don’t care about a topic you have made the greatest amount of comments in.