• VoxAdActa@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      you honestly believe EVERY SINGLE RELIGIOUS PERSON EVER has no critical thinking skills?

      I honestly believe the ones that matter certainly don’t. The ones who are paying the church’s bills and showing up to their pep rallies every week are very clearly not spending any time thinking about it.

      The LGBTQIA+ pastors that started a socialist christian church in Kentucky?

      Who? Let me know when they start affecting actual government policy, or even just going on TV and saying “We condemn those other Christians who say gay people should be shot in the back of the head.” That’s what we’ve been demanding from Muslims since 2001, why are you special?

      MLK? Malcom X? Johann Bernoulli, Blaise Pascal, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,

      Blah blah blah, fallacious appeal to authority, blah blah blah. Name-dropping is not “critical thinking”, and you really shouldn’t have included a literal, straight-up alchemist in that list if you were trying to use it to make a point.

      all of whom are some of the most important mathematicians in history and were religious, all couldn’t think for themselves?

      MLK and Malcom X were mathematicians? TIL.

      Immanuel Kant, famous influential philosopher, no critical thinking.

      So what I’m hearing you say here is: “If smart people believe in magic sky fairy, magic sky fairy must be logical to believe in,” which is about the level of discourse I’d expect from someone unfamiliar with the concept of critical thinking. Thanks for being an object lesson.

      • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
        shield
        M
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please disengage, this is simply not productive. I understand you may have been tangibly hurt by religious folks who have persecuted you or your loved ones. I have suffered real harm from this as well. But making sweeping statements about broad categories of people is generally not a great take and being confrontational with a moderator asking for some civility in a thread and appealing to humanity is not a good look.

          • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The top level comment from the mod was not aggressive or accusatory. They escalated.

            Ultimately it doesn’t matter who’s in the wrong, it’s time for everyone to disengage. This is not productive.

      • violetsareblue@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know, it’s fine to dislike religious people and believe different things. But you’re acting pretty intolerant here. Insulting others beliefs and intelligence isn’t cool just cause you disagree with it.

        “Level of discourse…from someone unfamiliar with the concept of critical thinking.” “Magical sky faerie” “fallacious appeal to authority”. You sound like a pseudo-intellectual who gets off on putting down others and you found a population that you feel you’re allowed to do this to.

        Reported your comment as well. You don’t have to be nasty just cause you dislike someone’s perspective on life. And don’t hit me with “well they hate xyz people”. I know you know not all religious folks share the same view - or I’d at least hope so.