• Sips'@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just me that feels like using “porn” in the community titles is a bit childish, was hoping that would stay a reddit thing tbh

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      The whole sfw.community instance is aimed at “SFW Porn” communities. It’s less about “serious” discussion and more for sharing pictures/videos with little depth.

      • Sips'@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah I get that, but surely other words could have been used instead? Might just be being old…

        • rglullis@communick.newsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I hesitated a bit before setting them up, but to be honest I couldn’t find any other term to express the idea of “something made to provide a visually appealing simulacrum of a topic without requiring any actual interest/ability in doing the real thing”.

          • neptune@dmv.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Pictures. Memes. Anarchy.

            There’s a few ways communities have signaled that the rules don’t require a thesis for every post.