Leading barrister warns that the kit – used to support gender-questioning children – is likely to be in breach of equality laws and could violate pupils’ rights
Archived version: https://archive.ph/jT7GK
Leading barrister warns that the kit – used to support gender-questioning children – is likely to be in breach of equality laws and could violate pupils’ rights
Archived version: https://archive.ph/jT7GK
I notice first off you’re conveniently ignoring how I have been referring to sex designations for the past several posts and instead exclusively focusing on my earlier statement about names.
Makes me doubt your faith, that.
I will broaden and ask why you think any imposition of a gender on a person who has not yet informed you what it is is laudable or appropriate, be that marker on a certificate or a gendered name?
BECAUSE YOU STILL HAVE NOT STATED AN ALTERNATIVE!
not doing that, Jesus.
You: “The fact that society does this is a problem!”
Me: “Okay. What do you think we should do instead?”
You: “I refuse to answer this question”
Are you trolling?
Stop doing that. Christ on a cracker.
If I told you “kicking puppies is wrong” would you demand ‘an alternative’ to do instead?
Don’t kick puppies.
Suppose you want your child to come inside and they haven’t chosen their own name yet. What do you do?
Concede being trans is sinful?
Oh wait no, that’s what you do.
Sweet fucking Lord. I already explained why I did that. I don’t believe it is, for the record, and you shouldn’t care what conservatives think is sinful either. Now stop digging through my post history for ad hominem attacks and state your fucking position.
I already did, and I don’t feel you are arguing in good enough faith—having been willing to concede being trans “is sinful”—to address you in any deeper detail.
You jump on the name thing rather than seeing it as an outcrop of assigning sex and gender and then bitch about it in other threads using disingenuous descriptions that conflate the two but only address the later.