• merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If i was stack overflow I would’ve transferred my backups to OpenAI weeks before the announcement for this very reason.

    This is also assuming the LLMs weren’t already fed with scraped SO data years ago.

    It’s a small act of rebellion but SO already has your data and they’ll do whatever they want with it, including mine.

    • trailee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s true that it’s mostly a symbolic act, but the rebellion matters, especially from old accounts. It’s also a nice way to mark the time after which I never participated in SO again. After my ban expires, I’ll deface my questions again. And again. Until they permaban me.

    • trailee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s also the possibility of adding to the wonderful irony of making the AI more useful than the original by having content that’s no longer accessible through through the original. It doesn’t get more enshittified than that, even if Prashanth Chandrasekar is too out of touch to ever regret his decision.

    • Muffi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you’re 100% correct in assuming they’ve already fed it data scraped from SO. I’ve previously gotten code samples from ChatGPT that was clearly from SO down to the comments in the code. Even reverse searched some of the code and found the question it was from.

    • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      OpenAI clearly already scraped the pre-LLM (aka actually useful) content from SO, this entire deal is happening after the fact to avoid litigation.