Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 7 months agoProton Mail Discloses User Data Leading to Arrest in Spainrestoreprivacy.comexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down10cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlsaugumastechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1221arrow-down1external-linkProton Mail Discloses User Data Leading to Arrest in Spainrestoreprivacy.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square92fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlsaugumastechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoDid you read the story? Or are you just here to stir the pot and display your Proton Fanboi bona fides?
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI question if you’ve read the story. Its a very clear case that is painted in the story.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months ago Its a very clear case that is painted in the story. Indeed it is. The police asked and Proton provided. Very clear indeed. At last, something we can agree on.
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoLike… They are required to do by law because its a terrorism case.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoQuestionable and not the point.
minus-squareMikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoThe pointis that the person is an idiot and Proton had to comply with a request about a terrorist.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoThe point is that Proton, a company that sells privacy, violated that trust, apparently without much of a fight. The Spanish police didn’t even allege that the person is a terrorist. I think we’re done here. We’re not even speaking the same language. Have a nice life.
minus-squareDiamond_AaronXG@mstdn.partylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months ago@CaptObvious @Mikufan if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue. Proton provides privacy not anonymity. Those are 2 different things. The second requires opsec in the users end.
minus-squareCaptObvious@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months ago if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue Agreed Proton provides privacy not anonymity Anonymity most certainly is a part of privacy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/it-privacy/ https://epic.org/issues/democracy-free-speech/anonymity/ https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/09/05/anonymity-privacy-and-security-online/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy
Did you read the story? Or are you just here to stir the pot and display your Proton Fanboi bona fides?
I question if you’ve read the story. Its a very clear case that is painted in the story.
Indeed it is. The police asked and Proton provided. Very clear indeed.
At last, something we can agree on.
Like… They are required to do by law because its a terrorism case.
Questionable and not the point.
The pointis that the person is an idiot and Proton had to comply with a request about a terrorist.
The point is that Proton, a company that sells privacy, violated that trust, apparently without much of a fight.
The Spanish police didn’t even allege that the person is a terrorist.
I think we’re done here. We’re not even speaking the same language.
Have a nice life.
@CaptObvious @Mikufan if the user practiced proper opsec it wouldn’t be an issue. Proton provides privacy not anonymity. Those are 2 different things. The second requires opsec in the users end.
Agreed
Anonymity most certainly is a part of privacy.