• wafflez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I do when it’s violating another being’s atonomy who can suffer lol. You’re the aggressor in the scenario. I am doing the baseline, you’re voting for death

      • wafflez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not voting Supporting buisness practices by paying for them is voting to keep those practices in buianess

        capacity to suffer Because if I were to hurt you, you wouldn’t like it. I respect your autonomy and believe it’s wrong to hurt you unless I absolutely had to to defend myself. We don’t need to hurt animals, we should love and care for them. Most people feel the same about dogs without advocating for their wellbeing, it shouldn’t stop at dogs.

        but nothing is immoral about eating meat or dairy or eggs or honey It encourages the commodification of animals. unless you’re dumpater diving there will always be harm to some degree aquiring animal products Meat is never painless, animals wait in a line and hear their fate up ahead at a slaughter house. Bolt guns don’t work properly and can worsen the situation. Breeding requiring AI (artifical semination) which is a violation of their sexual autonomy and outright disgusting that humans do that. Most never see daylight till the roadtrip to the slaughter house, without food or water. Honey encourages gassing, mailing queens without food or water for days, destruction to local bee populations, and malnurishment by replacing their honey with sugar water. Male egg laying hens get macerated alive at hatch. Eggs cause chickens to be extrmely malnourished. They produce vastly more eggs than they should and often end up with little to no calcium. They will eat their eggs to regain the nutrients if they can.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          you are projecting your ethics onto me. I take a different approach than you(clearly), so I have come to a different conclusion.

                  • wafflez@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    It is the standard practices around the world. Factory farming in most countries accounts for over 97% of all meat and dairy. Even according to the USDA (which supports animal agriculture, so no bias) for the US, which is higher up to 99% for chickens comparatively than other countries. Australia, new zealand, europe, india, all use factory farming as the main standard. Even if factory farming isn’t common in a country like certain parts of europe, nearly all animal products that are consumed are imported from factory farms

          • wafflez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Your different approach to ethics doesn’t make the killing acceptable. It’s wrong either way.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Your different approach to ethics doesn’t make the killing acceptable. It’s wrong either way.

              killing animals for food is good, actually.

              • wafflez@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s extremely wasteful. Animals lose most calories they intake through energy loss. Its better to grow plants and feed them to ourselves than to breed and kill. Would you be fine breeding and killing humans? Whats the morally significant difference?

          • wafflez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            With ethics people either end up doubling down on all murder being ok except for theirself or going vegan. There isn’t any morally significant difference that is so strong it justifies hurting animals and doesn’t justify hurting humans

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              With ethics people either end up doubling down on all murder being ok except for theirself or going vegan

              that’s just not true. kant was fine with animal husbandry and against murder.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              There isn’t any morally significant difference that is so strong it justifies hurting animals and doesn’t justify hurting humans

              i think you’re (clumsily) referring to the NTT argument, which falls afowl of the line-drawing fallacy

              • wafflez@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Lol you would rather do 15 backflips and double down than just stop hurting animals. NTT isn’t trash and criticism of it I’ve never found to hold up. Elaborate more don’t just state

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              voting is when people get an equal chance to decide the outcome of an election. buying things isn’t voting.

              • wafflez@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Voting is not inherently equal lol. You’re conflating and equality based democracy with voting. Voting is when you support someone or something with an action. You can’t wiggle your way around words with semamtics, it’s still voting. Either way you know what I mean by it so debating a definition is ridiculous

                  • wafflez@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    It’s literally how it works, idk why you always get caught on semantics. If you provide support for something, its voting. It’s pointless to get caught up on a definition if you understand what I mean, just wastes your time

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          any meat I get comes from an animal that’s long dead. my consumption can’t possibly harm it any more, and it can’t causally lead to any other animal beings harmed.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          all of your complaints about the animal industry aren’t going to be changed whether I’m vegan or not.