• spongebue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    So? If your invention depends on illegal plagiarism to exist, maybe it shouldn’t. It’s not the law’s fault that LLMs depend on other people’s work to function, nor was that its specific target when it was written

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      If your invention depends on illegal plagiarism to exist

      Have any of the trials finished? I knew there were some ongoing but hadn’t heard any rulings yet.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        The comment I was replying to basically said it has to be noncompliant (illegal) for the whole thing to work, as if that justified it. If a trial or whatever finds it’s not illegal, so be it, but I’d still have some moral issues about basically everything anyone ever does or has done turning into AI food