• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 个月前

    Not exactly a proxy war when Russian troops are personally in Ukraine. That’s just a war.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 个月前

      The Korean War had over a million NATO troops and also tens of thousands of Soviet troops and, somehow, remained a proxy war. A particularly bloody one, but there was still no actual open full-scale warfare between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even China and America remained officially at peace, despite making up the majority of the forces on each side

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 个月前

          Apologies, I was using “NATO troops” as a shorthand for the large number of countries involved rather than the specific command structure. You are right to bring that up

    • Mechanize@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 个月前

      Russia is actively in Syria from the end of 2015 as an official belligerent, it’s not something new for Russia to fight directly while others use only proxies.

      But I can see your point; still - officially - this is only a three days military operation. When that stance will finally change in the official channels, it will mean they can’t hold the mask anymore.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 个月前

      It’s not a proxy war between Russia and the US. It’s a proxy war between China and the US.

      Russia and Ukraine are the pawns

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 个月前

      It’s a proxy war because the two major powers are fighting in an area neither of them own.

      Iraq was a proxy war, even though US troops were there.