I get that it started for free with less intrusive ads, but YouTube has had a huge impact on the way we all share and consume information. Understanding how much money it takes to run a service with the technology needed to provide high definition videos on a site that is up 99.9999999% of the time, I have no issue paying for a service that has changed my life in many positive ways. Now I do hate price gouging like everyone else, but it’s inescapable from gas & groceries to all streaming platforms.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Same, streaming was the cure to piracy, but they got greedy and now piracy is the cure to streaming overload.

    Funny how we want one monopoly for streaming but any other kind of monopoly is bad.

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ikr? Nowadays, I’m quite fond of the idea of forcing media companies to license to all comers if they license to one company. Movie theaters don’t have exclusive rights to movies, so why do we let streaming services pull this shit? Having the same content across all platforms would mean that streaming services would have to compete on price and service quality.

    • Starbuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gabe Newell, the founder of Valve (Steam) had this to say

      “Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem”

      So many people are willing to pay if it’s a good experience. But if the experience sucks, people with money will find a better service, which in many cases ends up being free. If I wanted to have ads dumped everywhere while I watch videos, there are services that offer that “experience” for free.