• ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I learned bash thanks to AI!

    For years, all I did was copy and paste bash commands. And I didn’t understand arguments, how to chain things, or how it connects.

    • HighlyRegardedArtist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      You do realize that a very thorough manual is but a man bash away? Perhaps it’s not the most accessible source available, but it makes up for that in completeness.

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        30 minutes ago

        I believe accessibility is the part that makes LLMs helpful, when they are given an easy enough task to verify. Being able to ask a thing that resembles a human what you need instead of reading through possibly a textbook worth of documentation to figure out what is available and making it fit what you need is fairly powerful.

        If it were actually capable of reasoning, I’d compare it to asking a linguist the origin of a word vs looking it up in a dictionary. I don’t think anyone disagrees that the dictionary would be more likely to be fully accurate, and also I personally would just prefer to ask the person who seemingly knows and, if I have reason to doubt, then go back and double-check.

        Here’s the manpage for bash’s statistics from wordcounter.net: