BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down11
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?