BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down11
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoIt’s the other side of the same coin. They both argue about the well-being/bad-being of hypothetical humans. It’s bogus, either way.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoThey are not related because you have to exist to experience well-being or “bad-being”. What I’m talking about is consenting to exist.
It’s the other side of the same coin. They both argue about the well-being/bad-being of hypothetical humans. It’s bogus, either way.
They are not related because you have to exist to experience well-being or “bad-being”. What I’m talking about is consenting to exist.