• bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m honestly amazed they didn’t have ads out of the gate, Meta’s whole schtick is advertising and data.

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They thought they could EEE the fediverse first.

        Turns out people on decentralised social media aren’t totally fucking brain dead and could see it coming a mile away.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          If they had any intention of EEE the fediverse, they wouldn’t have required users to opt into it, or made it unidirectional.

          I think it’s pretty clear at this point that their only intention was to head off antitrust actions. But I think it’s safe to say we won’t see anymore development on that front in the near future.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Facebook famously didn’t have ads for a long time, even when people were pressuring Zuck to add them to keep the site from going running out of capital. Call it a loss leader, call it enshittification or market capture, whatever. Most companies that can afford to will start out being really great to their users, and once they have captured a section of the market, they start clawing more of that value back for themselves and their investors.