Did you forget that the argument started that EVs that were charged with a diesel generator is more effective than a regular diesel vehicle?
Based on that false claim you argued in favour of hybrids using the false pretense from the start, and that what I discredited by “put a diesel in the trunk”, because by your logic that would be more efficient than a diesel.
You even continued to argue in favour until I did the calculation. Even then you tried to weasel your way out by claiming your motor would indirectly charge your battery, which it doesnt.
I was never arguing that winning back lost energy with a secondary electrical system doesnt make sense. But that wasnt what you claimed. You wrongly assumed hybrids were using the motor to charge the battery, which they don’t.
Your numbers are not correct. Can you cite sources for them?
Even then you tried to weasel your way out by claiming your motor would indirectly charge your battery, which it doesnt.
Can you clarify this? The motor does both directly and indirectly charge the battery in most (if not all) hybrid cars.
You wrongly assumed hybrids were using the motor to charge the battery, which they don’t.
Yep there it is again. Definitely not trusting your armchair understanding of physics and automotive engineering.
Tell you what. Cite one example of a production vehicle where they removed they hybrid system and gained fuel economy, and I’ll admit that ICEs alone are much more efficient. Until then, you’re wrong, I’m right, and I have 3 real world examples to back it up.
Lol, you just claim my numbers arent correct because?
But you’re right, I compared the best stationary diesel engine with 50% efficiency instead of a usual one, and used the low end of efficiency of the diesel car. But that was in your favour.
Hi, ich hab mir grad den ganzen Thread angeschaut und muss noch schnell meinen senf dazu geben. Generator betriebene Elektrofahrzeuge sind tatsächlich effizienter als direkte Verbrenner im Realbetrieb aufgrund mehrerer Punkte:
RPM Effizienz
Wegen dieser Kurve hat ein ICE Fahrzeug Probleme die theoretische Effizienz in den meisten Fahrsituationen zu erreichen. Range Extender Motoren können ohne Getriebe direkt bei idealer RPM laufen.
Kleiner Hubraum
Range Extender Motoren können auf die durchschnittliche Leistung ausgelegt werden während Verbrennermotoren reserven für Beschleunigung und Bergfahrten brauchen. Kleinere Motoren sind effizienter.
P.S. i assumed from previous comments that you’re also a German (or at least german speaking) so I kept my comment in german. If I’m wrong and you (or a random reader) want a translation, just comment and I’ll do a translation tomorrow.
Did you forget that the argument started that EVs that were charged with a diesel generator is more effective than a regular diesel vehicle?
Based on that false claim you argued in favour of hybrids using the false pretense from the start, and that what I discredited by “put a diesel in the trunk”, because by your logic that would be more efficient than a diesel.
You even continued to argue in favour until I did the calculation. Even then you tried to weasel your way out by claiming your motor would indirectly charge your battery, which it doesnt.
I was never arguing that winning back lost energy with a secondary electrical system doesnt make sense. But that wasnt what you claimed. You wrongly assumed hybrids were using the motor to charge the battery, which they don’t.
Your numbers are not correct. Can you cite sources for them?
Can you clarify this? The motor does both directly and indirectly charge the battery in most (if not all) hybrid cars.
Yep there it is again. Definitely not trusting your armchair understanding of physics and automotive engineering.
Tell you what. Cite one example of a production vehicle where they removed they hybrid system and gained fuel economy, and I’ll admit that ICEs alone are much more efficient. Until then, you’re wrong, I’m right, and I have 3 real world examples to back it up.
Lol, you just claim my numbers arent correct because?
But you’re right, I compared the best stationary diesel engine with 50% efficiency instead of a usual one, and used the low end of efficiency of the diesel car. But that was in your favour.
There you go:
https://www.ourmechanicalcenter.com/archives/12117
https://www.tuev-nord.de/de/privatkunden/verkehr/auto-motorrad-caravan/elektromobilitaet/wirkungsgrad/
https://go-e.com/en/magazine/ev-charging-losses
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/College_Physics/College_Physics_1e_(OpenStax)/07%3A_Work_Energy_and_Energy_Resources/7.06%3A_Conservation_of_Energy
Hi, ich hab mir grad den ganzen Thread angeschaut und muss noch schnell meinen senf dazu geben. Generator betriebene Elektrofahrzeuge sind tatsächlich effizienter als direkte Verbrenner im Realbetrieb aufgrund mehrerer Punkte:
P.S. i assumed from previous comments that you’re also a German (or at least german speaking) so I kept my comment in german. If I’m wrong and you (or a random reader) want a translation, just comment and I’ll do a translation tomorrow.
Edison’s series hybrid electric truck gets 21mpg, beating comparable diesel only semi at 6-8mpg.
Took a bit, but there is your real world example.
You also still don’t have a real world example of a car that gained efficiency after removing the hybrid system.