New research shows renewables are more profitable than nuclear power::In a recent study, researchers from the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), the Stockholm School of Economics (SSE), and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) questioned the planned development of new nuclear capacities in the energy strategies of the United States and certain European countries.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not saying SMRs are impossible, I’m saying that the cost of them when compared to renewables is so ridiculously high that there’s no business case for them. We did it for submarines because you can’t use solar panels and wind turbines to power them.

    • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can’t use renewables for all power generation though. We don’t have the energy storage for that. Also over the long term nuclear can be profitable - it just requires a lot of investment and planning

        • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My guy if it wasn’t profitable companies wouldn’t build them.

          The fact you think we don’t need baseliad power is very questionable. Like where are you going to store all the energy from these renewables?

          Where are you getting your information from?