I mean the mediatek is nearly 460k points off, nearly 35%. That’s a pretty big difference. Is it noticeable by the user in most applications probably not but they aren’t close. The actual newest chips are though https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-list/rating
In terms of tablet scores yes. And I never said better but I did say closer. Even at that using kimovil as the source the 8 gen 2 in the Tab s9 ultra is only 1 percent behind the M2 in the iPad pro 6th gen. Which could be the difference between testing environments, thermal management, and straight up just better/worse quality silicon from chip to chip.
As far as the Dimensity 9200, you said soc comparison not tablet.
Mmm, I was talking about SOCs. The s9 ultra has the same screen res of the xiaomi pad6pro, so gen1 SOC looks faster than gen2. Unless its a problem of bad samsung ROMs
Definitely not the latest from Mediatek or Qualcomm.
And still, it looks like they’re as fast as M2.
I mean the mediatek is nearly 460k points off, nearly 35%. That’s a pretty big difference. Is it noticeable by the user in most applications probably not but they aren’t close. The actual newest chips are though https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-list/rating
s9 ultra appears to be slower than pad6 though. And I see no 9200 mtk around
In terms of tablet scores yes. And I never said better but I did say closer. Even at that using kimovil as the source the 8 gen 2 in the Tab s9 ultra is only 1 percent behind the M2 in the iPad pro 6th gen. Which could be the difference between testing environments, thermal management, and straight up just better/worse quality silicon from chip to chip.
As far as the Dimensity 9200, you said soc comparison not tablet.
Mmm, I was talking about SOCs. The s9 ultra has the same screen res of the xiaomi pad6pro, so gen1 SOC looks faster than gen2. Unless its a problem of bad samsung ROMs
You can’t compare results from different versions of the antutu benchmark.