New dating for White Sands footprints confirms controversial theory

arstechnica.com

cross-posted to:
archaeology@mander.xyz

New dating for White Sands footprints confirms controversial theory

arstechnica.com

RSS Bot@lemmy.bestiver.seMB to Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.seEnglish · 10 months ago

cross-posted to:
archaeology@mander.xyz

Results are consistent with two earlier studies dating the footprints to between 22,000 and 24,000 years ago.

Comments

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.se

hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se

Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

810 users / day
1.84K users / week
4.06K users / month
9.52K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
4.61K subscribers
31.3K Posts
18.8K Comments
Modlog