Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTodd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC'www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square199fedilinkarrow-up1435arrow-down123file-textcross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.world
arrow-up1412arrow-down1external-linkTodd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC'www.pcgamer.comEdgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square199fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.world
minus-squareAux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43arrow-down10·1 year agoI don’t know what your problem is, guys. When Skyrim was released, NVIDIA had GT 5xx series. Skyrim barely run at 40 FPS on Ultra on 1080p on a GT 560. Today, according to Gamers Nexus, Starfield runs at 60 FPS average on GTX 4060. So, Starfield is better optimised than Skyrim was. Go buy a new GPU.
I don’t know what your problem is, guys. When Skyrim was released, NVIDIA had GT 5xx series. Skyrim barely run at 40 FPS on Ultra on 1080p on a GT 560. Today, according to Gamers Nexus, Starfield runs at 60 FPS average on GTX 4060.
So, Starfield is better optimised than Skyrim was. Go buy a new GPU.