Lackner et al. show that individuals with an intermediate level of science knowledge tend to have overconfidence in their own knowledge and negative attitudes to science.
  • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
    13·
    1 year ago

    Yeah what the fuck this has zero actual evidence.

    Maybe I am someone the paper is talking about. I am interested in science. I like to use google scholar to check information on things. But I am fucking disillusioned with science for profit bullshit! Yeah, I don’t trust it as much as I used to because everyone is a soulless money grubbing husk these days.

      • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
        12·
        1 year ago

        yes, what suggested I didn’t? Is there evidence in the abstract? is there a way to access more than the abstract without having some special credential? I can see charts in a sidebar but I can’t enlarge them

        • freecandy@lemmy.world
          21·
          1 year ago

          You comments suggested it, again, did you pay to read the article or you just read the abstract?

          • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
            12·
            1 year ago

            No I didn’t pay to read the article, that’s my point. I read the available portion (the abstract). Making me pay to read whether an abstract has compelling evidence or not is a garbage m9del, that’s my point

              • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
                11·
                1 year ago

                Ah yes, I should be forced to pay yo see if things are true. This is a sustainable model…

                Oh wait no it isn’t. Misinformation is at all time highs. Maybe scientists should study why?

                My hypothesis: when things become expensive people improvise, this is true with Healthcare and education.