• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man, if your poinit of view is that you want to discourage high-profile people from visiting these museums because their blood is impure or whatever, I don’t know what to tell you, other than that all that’ll result in is less exposure to these places and these sins.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      My point is them visiting a museum means jack fucking shit.

      • GreenM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        It is not, it keeps the knowledge of the past happenings alive in general population. It doesn’t matter if it’s part of the court responsibles or marketing or whatever you call it. Media and people will talk about the visit, people will learn there is museum and why. Just like we are now chatting about it.

        Thus change that history won’t repeat itself get higher.

        • APassenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I guess this is where we’re supposed to agree that the status quo is working. Is that the angle?

          As long as we don’t take NEW advantage of the situation, the current advantage is fine?

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Adamantly agree. It’s token bullshit unless they do something real as a result.

        Will wait for that headline.and anger need not always be productive. Sometimes most to all avenues for productive discourse are shut down.

        But anger remains a legitimate and reasonable response.

        So… I agree with basically everything you’re saying here and I believe you’ve stated it clearly and well.