• enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    therefore we cannot assume that 6001 is exactly half of the total.

    Correct, all we can deduce is the bounds:

    Let x be the number of spears hoped for.

    6000 < x/2 < 6002

    12000 < x < 12004

    Edit: fixed error

    • rasensprenger@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Less than half and more than half imply strict inequality, so 6000 < x/2 < 6002, so 12001 <= x <= 12003

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re absolutely correct, it should be “<”. Since he wished for such an odd number, I wouldn’t constrain x to integers though. Maybe he wished for “more than twelve thousand spears”?