Aedis

Could’ve done without the insult.

Whoa spoilers!

Legion I think?

GDPR doesn’t just protect PII, it also protects user Generated Content.

This doesn’t make that behavior any less scummy, but have you tried using any Google website on a browser that isn’t chrome?

So your logic is that since we already have some toxic we should just go ahead and make it more toxic?

I didn’t see this one in the list, but UNN newscast from Starcraft 2 is one of my favorites! Particularly Donny Vermillion.

I used to work in a really big project written in C and C++ (and even some asm in there) and the build was non-deterministic. However the funky part was there was a C file in all of this that had a couple dozen of commented nee lines with a line at the top saying: ‘don’t remove this or the build will fail’ That remains my favorite code comment to this day.

It was definitely a loaded or insincere question. The use of “you would” instead of “would you” suggests that the person who is asking this question has already made up their mind about OP’s opinion. And no, I don’t think that was a typo, a Freudian slip maybe, but not a typo.

What do you have against licorice?! (also American licorice is crap) Try this:

LAKRIDS BY BÜLOW - Læmon - 10.4 OZ - Soft Licorice Swirled in Luscious White Lemon Chocolate, Cream and Vanilla https://a.co/d/9bCxy5A

I

Cool and all… But why did you have to post this over and over in a gajillion subs?

The answer to “is it part of the activityPub spec?” is more often than not a strong No.

That’s the fun part about being in a place where you can hold a discussion. Some people don’t agree with you, but they can still see the benefits of the option you are talking about or even agree that they are a great solution for now.

but by that logic, I could take 90% of your paycheck and say, “yes well you still made 10% which is way better than nothing!”

That’s already happening :)

I SE>

I know this is a joke cause it doesn’t have a color, but it’s “Guau, guau” too.

Source: I am Chilean.

At least what I see with this experiment/article is that is overly verbose, he takes a long time to get to the point. And then when he does his methodology shows an experiment that cannot be verified. Even when something is “subjective” we can still draw conclusions from it if we set up proper non-subjective ways of evaluating the results we see (ie. Rubrics). The fact that he doesn’t really say what leads him to say in detail what is a “terrible/v. bad/bad/good result” is a massive red flag in his method.

After seeing that, I no longer read the rest of it. Any conclusions drawn from a flawed methodology are inherently fallacies or hearsay.

If in any case it is further explained in the article and that somehow refutes what I’ve postulated later on, then I would have to say that the article is poorly written.

All this to say… I agree with you, not worth the read.

M

What? Ballmer hasn’t had anything to do with msft since 2014 man.