Right. I’m sure this time it will all be for a good cause, and not at all just to line the pockets of Trump’s favorite donors. You know, unlike all the other times, when that’s exactly what it was.
His track record for doing the right thing is 0%. There’s always an angle. And taxpayers will always be left holding the bag. You’d think after ten years of watching him scam the public, you guys would have figured this out by now…but, apparently not.
He didn’t have to write it down. He said everything he needed to say, on stage.
Trump says he loves dogs. He’s a huge fan of them. Am I morally required to hate dogs now? Is it supporting the Trump administration if I also love dogs?
First of all, Trump hates dogs. He calls people “dogs” as an insult.
And, no…you are not obligated to hate dogs, just because he says he likes them. But, if you’re paying attention to what Trump actually says about dogs, you’d know that he’s lying when he says he likes them.
That’s what you’re missing here.
No one is saying it’s bad to go after scammers abroad. What I’m saying is, that’s not what’s going to happen here. Everything Trump does is a favor to a donor. All that’s going to happen here, is that one of Trump’s friends is going to get paid taxpayer money for these “contracts”…whether or not they had a cybersecurity company already, or they just started one last week in order to cash in on this week’s giveaway.
It’s literally what he’s been doing with every single one of these little “projects”. His donors get “vetted” by him…regardless of whether or not they qualify for the job…and make ten times what they donated to his campaign in return for that donation.
It’s all a scam.
OMG. Are you seriously this gullible? Did you wake up yesterday morning, with your memory wiped? Does the name Trump not ring a bell?
It has never mattered what Trump “says” in these memorandums. The results are always the same. He’ll take the most noble of sentiments, and use it to do the most despicable things. Why? Because it’s always about the money with him.
JFC, man. Do you honestly think that “this time, he really means it, because it’s such an important thing”? Everything this administration does, is for the enrichment of Trump donors. It’s all a racket.
Do this…but with legitimate government oversight. There are literally already branches of the Federal government that do this, or could be further empowered to do more.
All this is, is another way from Trump to funnel taxpayer money to his donors.
So…he’s privatizing law enforcement, now? Cool.
See? Now that’s the shit I’m talking about. That’s integrity. Good for her.
Personally, I’d be much more interested to hear from actors that turned down roles like this, rather than from the ones still profiting from them.
JK Rowling has spoken about how she wrote the first Harry Potter book while she was employed at Amnesty International and how much that experience influenced her writing, and how she learned “the power of human empathy” from working there.
Ummm. Ok.
This is clearly some kind of mental illness.
Fuck all these sell-out assholes, pretending like their opinions matter, when they’re still willing to work for her.
The move is part of the Trump administration’s broader tariff strategy, which it says will encourage people to buy American-made goods and attract investment from foreign companies.
So…isn’t this just an admission that it really has nothing to do with national security?
Holy shit. That’s just wild.
“Some of you may die, but it’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make.”
Sure. It’s fine to acknowledge that they think they’re helping people…but the real nuance comes from understanding that those policies actually aren’t helping people.
“We don’t need policies that will help people…we just need to win elections”, is literally why things suck so much.
She volunteered for this when she cut a deal with Rubio. Make no mistake, she sold Maduro out in exchange for the keys to the kingdom.
Ok…but, what the fuck though? The article focuses only on the fact that the alert never got taken down…resulting in a 2nd armed stop.
But, what about the first one? Was that a mistake too? The article just rolls right past the fact that she never should have been pulled over in the first place…let alone twice. “Oops, we forgot to delete that” is bad enough…but, “Oops, we pulled you over twice for no reason” is worse.
The Toblerone Express.