Oh cool! Not terribly far, then.

That looks like the Rio Grande in New Mexico! Did you happen to stay at the Bosque Birdwatching RV Park? I miss that place

Both?

I thought Veritasium was a Harry Potter spell but apparently I should have already known and watched a YouTube video before posting my silly thoughts.

Word! That’s cool

I don’t know how relevant this is but I heard human eyes are very good at picking shades of green out. Maybe mammals are generally good at spotting greens and so hiding as a green thing doesn’t work as well. Just a guess though

Didn’t they not get along great before John got got?

Any time. I had to check to remember how.

Open the app and scroll up to refresh.

Maybe they reuse the bags. Bag up 5th Street, salt it, collect the bags and prep 6th.

I love how, for me in my limited knowledge, at a broad glance, this piece has almost a cartoon-like, more simplistic look, but the more time I spend looking, the more detail and realism appears to me. Very cool, thanks for sharing this.

What a beautiful painting, thank you for sharing. I’ve recently moved to the southwest and fallen in love with the area, what little I’ve seen. The colors and textures really work together to capture the feeling of the place, and of seeing a shower roll by and the race to stay ahead of it and stay dry. I’ve never rode a horse, but looking at this painting I can’t help but wish I was riding alongside them, trying to get home before we were soaked.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Definitely drink milk from the bottom of your bag though, that’s fine and normal.

When a piece of content that doesn’t allow downvotes, like a tweet, has lots more reposts than it does likes, the “ratio” is seen as proof the opinion was disagreed with, proportionally to the “ratio” itself.

It’s only ever those specific things, because if society actually LIKED or WANTED those things anymore they’d be doing them and it wouldn’t need to be “conserved”.

Oh, you want to keep your traditional folk dance or scarf or goat-herding technique? Great! Those damned melting pot liberals love that stuff. They eat it up. They want more cultures to explore. What they don’t want is to be told they’re going to hell for who they love, or that child labor is good or any of the other insane things “conservatives” want to conserve.

You’re again correct, they use a lovely little modifier we call in English “And”. It lets you do two things as one thing. So you can legalize something, and regulate it, in one legislative action. But you couldn’t regulate something, and then legalize it, because if the government is regulating something they’ve defacto legalized it. If it’s illegal it can’t be regulated because the only regulation allowed for illegal things is “none at all ever”.

Yeah, correct. But you can’t implement that framework on anything until it is legalized. It can be your very next action. But the lawful government cannot, by definition regulate illegal activity, so first you pass one legal motion and then you do the next. That doesn’t mean you can’t have a plan for move 2 before you make move 1.

What does this part of conservativism that you subscribe to seek to conserve? How is it not in line with American conservativism?