KairuByte

Not failing, but actively ignoring Metas own research that shows Facebook is directly harmful to children and teens.

I’d say actively continuing to harm children should outrank being a jackass and/or incompetence.

Depends on if we consider Zuccer a person.

These “ai says” articles are all fluff. You can get an LLM to say just about anything you want. This is akin to “my child says we should eat the neighbor.”

Seed boxes are inherently handling replaceable data, bar unpopular torrents. This is such a silly comparison.

We’ll still be hulks, it just won’t be that incredible.

Oddly I can see neither this reply, nor my original comment, but can reply from my inbox within Voyager.

Relevant: https://youtu.be/ozezG1zpxXQ

You can have the most secure and secret OS in existence, and you’re failing miserably the moment it has unfettered access to the internet.

On the flip side, literally any OS can be secure if it’s airgapped in a sealed room.

There’s a happy medium in there, and that’s where most governments want to be.

Somewhat niche a use case, but *extremely interesting. Hopefully it can be adapted for other conditions!

Then the social left started pushing things that it wanted purely because of morals

Example?

Do you mean Calibre?

Bots are indeed a problem, but at the same time so are the huge swaths of users dedicated to a single users whim. When one person with enough pulls says “I want to take over this entire area of the canvas” and it happens in minutes?… it ruins the experience. Bots are just a way for this to happen without the following.

“Opinion,” in case you were serious.

The only issue this would truly cause in the long run is a bit of admin work. There are and were plenty of scabs willing to take over unmoderated subs. Sure, the quality of those subs would have suffered, but Reddit never cared about that beyond what essentially boiled down to “don’t let “bad” content stay up.” Beyond that, mods could do whatever they wanted for the most part.

It’s healthier than anything on their menu.

Very odd. I’d have thought they were gonna go for one take as much as possible, but I guess not.

That is honestly impressive. I can confidently say I’ve only owned one wired headset for a decade, and it’s the one I use for gaming so it never leaves my office.

Everything else has either broken, or been lost. Though I fully admit, serviceable wireless buds would be a thing of beauty. IIRC there are people out there actively working on the problem (other than the companies explicitly aiming for them to be a consumable forever.)

Did we see anything? They are offline whenever I check but it seems they were live about 20m ago?

I’ve owned three Bluetooth headsets in total. The first I lost, the second is now my wife’s, and the third I still use. I wouldn’t call them disposable, but I’ll agree they are easier to lose.

Something a wired set of anything can’t give me is absolute freedom to move my head and walk away from my phone. I will never willingly go back to wired for anything other than gaming.

They did have a dongle for it. Annoying, but not insurmountable by any means.