

I’m thinking, how are youtube shorts and Instagram reels any different from tiktok


I’m thinking, how are youtube shorts and Instagram reels any different from tiktok


I hear America is full of cycopaths
What has Qanon actually predicted?
President Trump would initiate The Storm, an attack against the deep-state actors responsible for the global pedophile cabal.
No
the group identified Q’s influence when Alabama’s football team presented Trump with a jersey bearing the number 17, which also happens to be the position of letter Q in the alphabet.
OK. I’m out.


Why won’t waymo work in Chicago specifically?


Yeah. It comes down to Freedom to roam in Northern Europe and squatters rights in the extreme physical parallel. Entering is fine as long as there is no breaking.
In the digital relm i would argue that brute forcing a password is like jimmying a lock, but finding a password is like finding a key.
But I think your point is the strongest. It doesn’t matter what either of us think. It totally depends on the justice system that has jurisdiction and those rules could be anything.


The account holder violated the contract with the serviceprovider. The “hacker” has no agreement with anyone so they violated nothing. They found a key on the ground and used it in a lock.
I watched someone print his screen by putting his monitor on the photocopier.


The backlash is still happening. IMHO this is better than a knee jerk response.


… Dibbler was an extremely good hot sausage salesman. He had to be, given the nature of his sausages


Can dead men either provide or deny authorisation?
Can dead men get hacked?


So, Epstein has given out his account details by putting them in an email.


How is authorization determined?


If i give someone my bank details and passwords and they empty my account, can I claim I’ve been hacked?
No.


But, like, this one specifically
Because it is a ridiculous example that is highly memeable. DoJ was so lazy they even censored the most famous face in the world.
But claiming they lied about there being a real person’s face on there is just self serving.
Trust in justice is so low that we don’t believe their explanation for censorship. There is no serving of self in that statement.


The dirty perverts trapped in Epsteins honeypot were innocent. Everyone except Epstein is a victim and needs protection.


Why would they lie about this?
To hide the fact that the redactions are decided by AI and the files could have been released months ago.
Low returns and people leaving is not a problem.
There will still be enough validators to secure the network. The remaining will get a higher return.
Pre 2008 conviction contacts can be excused by ignorance. E.g. Stephen Hawking visited Epstein Island with other scientists in 2006.
Gates was happy to make house visits to Epstein in 2011-2014
“I’m, like, a smart person. I don’t have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day,”