Krusty

ML is a bunch of edgelords that crave licking boot.

From the public comments indexed in search results, the account seems politically left-wing and fairly combative in tone. For example, in one discussion about Chinese internet censorship, the user argued that some people “absolutely … do need someone controlling the information they consume” and also commented that propaganda can still be factually correct.

Fucking tankies…

Highest price yet.

Oh, look, brainrot.

get out the vote!

No! Don’t vote for who you actually want. WTF is wrong with you?

Fun.

Annualized, that could easily become a few hundred thousand. In 2 years over a billion.

Basic exponential growth is concerning.

response in a forum puts people off

I don’t care. I can’t fix stupid. I can explain things. I can’t understand them for you.

People that make claims without evidence will have them dismissed for exactly that reason. If that’s putting you off, then kiss off.

It’s from a movie called Zardoz. Sean Connery in red underwear and red suspenders that double as bullet holders. With thigh high black boots and a pony tail.

If your not sure whether to be aroused or terrified, that’s understandable.

You have been raised up from Brutality, to kill the Brutals who multiply, and are legion. To this end, Zardoz your God gave you the gift of the Gun. The Gun is good! The Penis is evil! The Penis shoots Seeds, and makes new Life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the Gun shoots Death and purifies the Earth of the filth of Brutals. Go forth, and kill!

Zardoz has spoken.

Around (4 to 6) * 10^(26 to 27) J total

1 gigawatt is 10^9 J/s (so around 130 billion years to reach the above.) For a terawatt that’s 130 million years. For a petawatt 130,000 years. For an exawatt about 130 years…

Note: the sun bathes Earth with around 170,000 TW (0.17 exawatts) of energy. That’s about 700-800 years if you could make the oceans sink all that sun energy. Again, this isn’t the total output of the Sun but just what impacts Earth directly.

The reference is my formal education in the subject matter. I’m honestly quite certain this person needs an education more than a paper that without such an education they’d fail to comprehend.

It’s a search engine for scientific literature.

I’m set off? 😂

It’s very difficult to prove a negative. There’s tons of papers out there with weak evidence and poor methodologies and very low citations claiming various non-ionizing EM are bad. The problem is the lack of reproducibility. You can look up meta-analysis on this, if you like.

Well shit, now you’re in a list.

There’s also a large selection effect. Organizations often reward traits adjacent to psychopathy:

• emotional detachment under pressure,
• relentless competitiveness,
• charisma without empathy,
• willingness to externalize harm,
• obsession with growth and dominance.

Also even if you didn’t cook it the germs that live in soil are not the same germs that make you sick, those you get from your fellow humans.

Ya, sure, you’ve obviously never heard of gardia, tetanus, botulism, histoplasmosis, anthrax, E coli, salmonella, and the ever popular listeria. Plus you could pick up a party of parasites and worms.

Very pastoral. Very grounding. Touch grass, acquire necrotizing fasciitis.

My big thing was cook your vegetables and limit fruit intake, especially because he prizes over ripe and high fructose fruit.

He’d basically would leave fruit out to rot, covered in fruit flies, and then he would still eat that shit. I got him to put that shit in a bowl and cover it with a towel.

He would complain though. The flies need to eat, too.

So he would throw compostable material around his yard… Which arrested pests, naturally. Then there was the rats in the walls and ceilings… But the rent was cheap!

I’m not sure what you’re asking for… Bluetooth is extremely low power. An order of magnitude from consumer WiFi. Which itself is far less than cellular signals, which are far weaker than broadcast (radio and TV.)

https://scholar.google.com/

He seemed to like fruit the riper it got. His favorite bananas would be brown and mush (he called it ‘like candy, so good.’). I tried it. Tasted funky and fermented, like ethanol(and other fuesal alcohols). I think he might have been getting lowkey drunk/buzzed off overly ripe fermented fruit, which would definitely provoke some mad squirts.

But then again this guy didn’t believe in germ theory. I showed him microscopic media of bacteria and viruses and fungi, even white blood cells doing what they do best (seek and destroy invaders!) He claimed it was all fake news/CGI/AI… We even made kombucha (I taught him how.) Which he enjoyed… Which I guess it’s just magic to him and not basic fermentation…

Cardiometabolic function isn’t the same as metabolic syndrome. Cardiometabolic function would be like a spectrum or perhaps a map. Metabolic syndrome would be the section of spectrum(say red in the rainbow) or area on the map (like a swamp) that designates the “danger zone.”

Here the term “optimal” is used and that’s around 7 percent as having optimal cardiometabolic function. That doesn’t instantly mean 93 percent are impaired. The other classes are **intermediate, which is half of people, ** and lastly poor which was ~44 percent.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-021-00388-4

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40170-020-00237-2

Fat can be oxidized for ATP via β-oxidation (look up FAO or catabolism, or see above links.) Fat → fatty acids → β-oxidation → acetyl-CoA + electron carriers → electron transport chain → ATP.

Example: Palmitic acid, a 16-carbon fatty acid, undergoes 7 rounds of β-oxidation producing 8 acetyl-CoA total. After everything runs through the Krebs cycle and electron transport chain, you end up with roughly 106 ATP. Which is a huge amount compared with glucose(1 glucose is about 30 ATP.)

You aren’t making much sense though. It’s like if you took endocrine physiology and smashed it into a story about a single villain.

Weight gain is typically merely about CICO, barring rare genetic disorders. With an unimpaired metabolism, if you eat excess calories you will gain weight. No hormonal imbalance necessary. This is basic energy expenditure(Calories Out) to calories consumed(Calories In, thus CICO.)

Actual metabolic syndrome afflicts 30-40 percent of Americans. Not anywhere near 96 percent. Some people are just fat and diet and exercise will absolutely work metabolically to control their weight. Some people lack of willpower. Gastric bypass again proves that with caloric reduction their metabolism, in most cases, is fully capable of sustaining weight loss.

Cancer metabolism is also flexible. It does not exclusively depend on glucose and is not “starved” by removing carbs. Fats and amino acids are fair game for many cancers. Gluconeogenesis alone creates sufficient glucose to feed cancer.

4x is quite an exaggeration…