Oh good; so it stands between your credibility; some rando fucking wise guy on the internet and that of the German Public Broadcasting service…

lmfao

Again, quoting the article, it says that many students (although maybe not most) will graduate without an understanding of these three subjects.

How can that be considered a positive, and what’s even more; acceptable?!

What the hell are you talking about!? It says in the article that these three subjects have been moved out of mandatory learning.

Meaning that most Indian students won’t understand the basic principles of evolution or the most simple understanding of the composition of elements.

Not considering either of these three to be essential mandatory learning is insane.

It’s called a ‘for profit business’, look it up, people!

Well, I guess you do that and waste other peopels time… Since on here you cannot just ban your problems away; you have to report them.

Now, why the hell would I care why people waste time responding to a comment they don’t even understand!?

And I’m talking about the post, you know, the post in which this comment section is linked…

Sure.

Lemmy, like Reddit, ain’t never been nice, and now it’s in total meltdown. So basically, double the ‘ain’t nice’

No, I’m talking about the responsibility of voting

Not a good look for your side

And what side is that?

And that motivates branding Gen Z males as ‘Hitler Youth’?!

Get out of here, lmao.

Lemmy right now is saltier than the earth of Carthage after the Roman’s victory.

Lmao, ‘it was the husband’s fault’, good one.

Seems to me a little belittling to not attribute responsibility to women when shit hits the fan.

No, you’re thinking of philosophy. Philosophy is a discussion. Science is a process. Just the fact that they are being accused of being misleading and outright falsyfyiing evidence is enough to simply ignore their purported results until they can produce a paper that fixes all those problems.

It’s not a discussion whether we can agree on something. The evidence should do the only talking.

Don’t spread it around. It’s a complete fraud of a paper for all we know. Just the fact that it has convincing rebuttals is enough to make you consider it irrelevant.

I remember reading this simply terrible article in Scientific American; the entire article was based on this research paper referred to the meme above.

The paper was a complete fraud, and people just guzzled the cool-aid. He’ll they still do, looking at this thread.

I always wondered how much IGN is commissioned to write these nonsense articles for promotion.

Try thousands. Most expensive ship runs you about 3000$

Get a grip, dude.

It is sort of interesting that Bo, in a way, depicts his version of the Sacrifice of Isaac, otherwise a very popular reanissanse motive; the scene having been painted by Carvaggio, Rembrandt and Filippo Lippi.