Well this is just the last boss in super smash bros., and yes its a huge asshole.

Thats sort of what’s being done with ayauasca and other psychedelic drugs. Like a medication hammer that knocks you silly and resets your brain.

Probably the latter.

You really told me, mister!

Still harder than using signal.

I can clarify.

First I was asking for an example of a better solution, because I’m not aware of one and it would be nice to learn about one.

The next reply was me being sarcastic because instead of just giving a quick explanation of an idea, you dismissed me and told me to essentially “google it”. Since you aren’t treating me in good faith, I replied in kind.

Maybe when you are feeling better you can give this another shot. Have a better day.

Kids dont naturally rebel against authority figures. If they respect the authority figure, they are remarkably adaptable and can make great change quickly. If they dont respect the authority figure, they will do as you say.

Wow very helpful. Thanks for advocating for your cause so effectively. Clearly your rhetoric will win the day.

Do you have an example of a privacy friendly alternative?

I guess we shouldn’t attempt to restrict them then huh.

Sounds a bit conspiratorial to me but thats just my opinion on it.

Guns are a better example. Thieving tools is another.

Feel free to keep voting it down then.

The only way to prevent this is to figure out a way to solve the problem of criminals using encrypted services, without it affecting those not committing crimes. If bad solutions keep getting voted down, eventually one that makes sense will be proposed.

They will keep proposing solutions until the problem is solved. Notice how everytime its voted down they try a different idea? Thats how its supposed to work.

Same with my dog but hes not interested in the nylon or femurs, probably because he can’t figure out how to tear them apart.

You should re-read my post because you are attacking a point I didnt make.

They both are helpful just in different ways. Ideally wed have the ASPCA and Peta working together for a better outcome, but unfortunately thats not usually the case.

The ASPCA typically has a lower euthanasia rate than PETA because it often employs more selective admission policies, focusing on adopting out animals rather than accepting all animals regardless of their condition. In contrast, PETA operates as an open-admission shelter, which means it takes in all animals, leading to higher euthanasia rates due to the number of unadoptable or severely ill animals it receives.

Its not going anywhere until the truth of how it was written and edited over 2000 years becomes common knowledge.