- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
0·28 days ago@Buffalox I would argue that you can and should label it a war. A significant part of Ukraine had been illegally occupied (Krym), another part was invaded and partially occupied (Donbas, which is two regions), military confrontation with advanced weapons systems was a fact.
@Buffalox that is the Russian narrative, yes. But there is ample evidence that Russian servicemen and entire russian units took part in the invasion of Donbas. Most of the “local rebels” were actually Russian serving citizens. After all, “local rebels” can not operate complex weapon systems like attack helicopters, integrated long range air defence systems etc, it takes quite a bit of training to operate efficiently.
@Buffalox well no, the same year Russia began the war, they invaded parts of Donbas, and war has been going on since 2014. The same war.
@Buffalox @wildflower it’s the 12th year…
@witty_username @supersquirrel not really, but do prioritize batteries, powerbanks and generators.
@Archangel1313 @Sunshine true, how many agreements has Russia broken? 43 I belive? No paper is trustworthy. Russia must be broken
@HowRu68 to a certain level of course, but yes indeed.
@TheAsianDonKnots @supersquirrel because they have unique capabilities, like penetration of hardened shelters, much larger war head, twice the speed of a drohne at least. For certain key installations there are no alternatives
@urandom @snoons Russia went from being Moscow to the largest country in the world. Russia started the 2nd most wars during the last 100 years. Yes, it is fair to say that Russia is synonymous with aggressor