• 62 Posts
  • 1.45K Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2024

help-circle

  • The issue is that both Zionist lobby groups/political activists and authoritarian politicians and law enforcement (or well police, bc. often things later get thrown out in court) like to misinterpret it, if it is not said specifically. Do you remember how shortly after October 7 2023 Pierce Morgan and similiar did the whole “Do you condemn Hamas?” thing over and over again, no matter how displaced it was to the matter at hand? Well imagine that but with the police enforcing it and you get the state of public discourse in Germany for the past two years.

    When it comes to speech about Palestine and Israel the executive in Germany will go on the basis of guilty until proven innocent. This leads to arbitrary and often violent arrests, searches of peoples homes, confiscations of devices… Even if all of that is later thrown out in court or the prosecutors don’t even bother to make a charge it has tremendous negative effects for the people targeted.

    For instance in Berlin almost no demonstration for the rights of Palestinians go without police violence. Francesca Albanese the UN special rapporteur had multiple events in Germany cancelled or spaces denied last minute because of pressure from the government and reported that she was threatened with arrest. Finally take this example of the radically Zionist Axel-Springer Media specifically targeting activists in Berlin with Names and Pictures. Note how two out of the 6 people they attack are anti-zionist Jews.

    There is no rational reasoning with German authorities or Zionist groups in Germany.


  • You can’t ban a personal story from a competition,” she told NBC News in a Zoom interview earlier this month.

    Yes you can. Nobody talks about whether Russia would send a song that is “personal”. The country is in gross violation of international law and that is the reason for the ban. It is completely irrelevant what the song is about. The country is the problem and the song is presented as an entry for the country.

    It shouldn’t matter what the lyrics are about to begin with as Israel should not be allowed to participate while committing some of the most heinous crimes against humanity.



  • Do they use concrete? They compete in the concrete industry. Do they use steel? They compete in the steel industry. Do they need structural planning and approval? They compete over structural designers and inspectors. Do they need project management? They compete over project managers. Do they need logistics? They compete over logistics. Do they need electric wiring? They compete over electric wiring. Do they need controls and automation? They compete over controls and automation. Do they need electrical engineers? They compete over electrical engineers. Do they need construction site managers? They compete over those too. Do all of the companies involved need IT, accountants, attorneys, HR, managers, offices…? yes they do, so they compete there too.

    Offshore wind plants need onshore buildings too, where there is control structures, converters, grid access… Denmark is a flat and island rich country. It is likely that a nuclear power plant would be built by the sea, so you also need maritime engineers…

    Finally, if loans are a thing why don’t all countries just take on infinite loans and solve all their infrastructure needs at once? Denmark has its own currency still and is a relatively small country. What do you think happens if Denmark goes from a national debt of around 2-3 billion € to a national debt of 50 billion € to finance a mayor new nuclear plant? Just buying all those Euros will deflate the DKK into worthlessness.


  • Financial resources are resources. Also there are markets for project management, engineers, construction work… The concrete for the foundations is made in the same plants, imported material has to be transported on the same roads/railways/waterways…

    All these resources that are not strictly specific to either industry will be competed over, driving the prices and also limiting how fast things can be done.

    You can try eating and drinking at the same time and chewing bubble gum on top. Good luck keeping it separated while swallowing.











  • https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=45596

    Utility-scale battery storage costs decreased nearly 70% between 2015 and 2018

    So we are looking at much lower numbers in a few years as the trend has continued.

    You can save money with solar and batteries, but only after about 30 years.

    That is false.

    Example for US around 7.5 years with tax credit -> pessimistically 15 years

    Example for Germany 7 years w.o., 12.5 years with battery storage. -> pessimistically 20 years.

    hat’s a much longer payback time than any other forms like nuclear.

    That is false. Take the spanish nuclear industry for example

    Nuclear power plants are not amortized. Every year they invest around 300 million Euro. Nuclear generation is currently incurring losses due to a disproportionate, discriminatory and confiscatory taxation.

    The amortization of nuclear power plants is not complete. In fact, from this time to the end of its operation it will be necessary to invest around €3 billion to maintain the plants in optimal safety and reliability conditions.

    Take Germany for an example

    Bei neugebauten Kernkraftwerken in Deutschland werden laut dem Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz Gestehungskosten zwischen 14 und 19 Cent pro Kilowattstunde erwartet. Das Forum Ökologisch-Soziale Marktwirtschaft gibt in einer Studie für Greenpeace Energy an, dass die gesamtgesellschaftlichen Kosten in Deutschland im Jahr 2021 zwischen 26 und 38 Cent pro Kilowattstunde lagen.

    Allerdings geraten auch abgeschriebene Kernkraftwerke in Märkten, in denen die Strompreise infolge aktueller wirtschaftlicher Entwicklungen wie des Schiefergasbooms in den USA sowie des Ausbaus von erneuerbaren Energien in vielen Staaten der Welt gefallen sind, wirtschaftlich unter Druck. In den USA wurden deshalb in den letzten Jahren mehrere Kernkraftwerke lange vor ihrem genehmigten Laufzeitende außer Betrieb genommen.

    So nuclear power at best only generates profits if the market is arbitrarily restricted and the power plants are protected against low energy prices, which in turn means to stifle economic growth and competitiveness in everything else.

    More realistically new nuclear power plants are a mass grave of capital. See UKs hinkley point now at more than 50 billion € for 3.2 GW. That is a whooping 15,625 €/kW.


  • Which is why we should work towards a strong European army rather than strong national armies as the earlier comment said. A strong German army will not be at the center of it.

    Also Germanies post WW2 military is riddled with wasting money, inefficiencies, ineptitude, subversion by far right extremists…

    Germany has no basis to belief it would do military better than its neighbors. So any historical argument will have to deal with the fact that a strong German army historically was always about invading its neighbors. This also does not hold true for strong armies of countries like the Netherland that historically did not invade neighbors so much, but rather took control over trade routes and colonies. That isn’t better, but it is not a historic threat to other European countries. For Germany as a rule of thumb you can say that strong army = invading Poland soon.

    With the ever stronger rise of the fascists in Germany and other European countries, often financed by Russia and with the goal to undermine unity inside the EU it is also something to consider. If the EU should fall apart for any reason a strong German army will be a threat to everyone around them, in particular Poland.

    It is therefore crucial both as a lesson from history and in looking at the current political developments to build an EU army that is not just some national armies loosely put together.



  • Denmark is surrounded by sea. Offshore wind power is pretty reliable and it is a lie that solar and batteries would be more expensive than building nuclear power plant. Plenty of households theses days buy solar with battery and safe money with it comparing to buying from the grid. And nuclear power is the most expensive in the grid. For Europe nuclear is at around 20 cents/kWh, coal around 8-10, lignite around 5, and solar is down to less then 5 cents/kWh.

    Furthermore nuclear power will get more expensive the more demand is there as Uranium is a finite resource. And the most likely trading partner will be Russia or countries under Russias influence.