Oh and to do this, just tap anywhere near the top of the screen

Default scroll-to-top behaviors on status bar tap (or re-implementations of it in multiplatform PWAs) are a common culprit behind random scroll to top behaviors reported for mobile apps in the past decade or so. Not sure if that’s what’s up but worth checking if that gives you repro.

Yet in principle the social benefit described (amplifying voices of the unheard) isn’t entirely out of reach for social media as a category, especially if we can escape the era of closed platforms. Open alternatives are still relatively new. There is a plausible future in which closed platforms are left behind and we become much more capable of keeping mass public manipulation in check.

deleted by creator

Agreed, I’m pretty used to security key unlocks and still wouldn’t want that friction on a personal device.

Also just for completeness, since I forgot to mention: enabling stolen device protection and findmy/mdm to enable remote wipe.

Disclaimer: I only use iPhones for security testing, so this is more from related literature rather than first-hand experience.

IIRC the hardening unattended reboot could offer is already covered better by options like disabling biometric unlock, security key 2FA, enabling lockdown mode, enabling advanced data protection, disabling iCloud, disabling USB accessories, and so forth. Also unattended reboot seems like an easy prank vector or foot gun to render a device permanently inaccessible (i.e., device always reboots immediately after pin entry) requiring recovery mode reset or restore to fix.

lazy voters who … vote dem only when shit is completely falling apart and not a second before

I’ll take them. I’ll welcome them with open arms. I’ve seen with my own eyes Orthodox Jews show up to pro-Palestinian protests en masse wielding the biggest signs and creating phalanxes to shield seated student protestors. I’ve seen obvious suburbanites show up to urban BLM protests in country club pastels to stand as meat shields in front of riot police.

There are groups in the US who stay out of politics completely as a matter of cultural or religious separatism who nevertheless observe from afar and will break their rules to emerge in times of great upheaval and bolster the ranks of those fighting injustice and oppression.

There are Americans of privilege who will accept physical, financial, and social risk on their neighbors’ behalf.

There are Americans who have very little and can’t show up to the fight without risking their livelihood, yet do so anyway.

And yes, there are the lazy, the homebodies, and agoraphobic types who nonetheless quietly turn up to do their part, even if all they can contribute is their presence.

I will always welcome them.

“…15 days ago”

If similar to equivalent state regs, when access to customers residing in that market is gated by compliance and subject to lawsuits or ban, the first phase of business-side operations change is immediately setting up minimum compliance workflow like a special webpage coupled with countermeasures (like proof of residency; IP historically difficult in court but has been used successfully for state-specific age gating) and boundary testing cycles. With especially large markets, however, the overhead associated with maintaining multiple separate workflows fails the efficiency test and the workflows are merged, which is how everyone tends to benefit from pro-consumer laws like GDPR.

Oh shit. I’ve been trying to put to words what I find so obnoxious about tankies and you just nailed it.

Before you go go whoops didn’t see post body

I thought it was Alex Jones watching his reruns.

Gotta be Craigslist. There’s a small learning curve due to the simplicity of bulletin board sales, but there’s zero overhead so all money stays local. Peter Thiel gets none of it.

Just pointing out that the same warning (company app handled data pre/post E2EE and may have snooped) applies to Apple, Proton, and Gmail. Basically you take their word they don’t read it. Once you have evidence to the contrary they forfeit that trust forever. Snapchat’s privacy campaign is over now.

Boring answer but besides a few quixotic individuals who reserve high value digital real estate for loved ones JIC, most online accounts created on behalf of those with little agency (babies, pets, etc) were created exclusively to funnel more attention to the attention-addicted creator, whether via cute photos or puppetry.

But these accounts are abandoned once the attention well dries up. The account credentials are soon forgotten and within a few years the accounts are garbage collected by inactivity pruning algorithms, or hacked and disabled. In any case, they’re long gone by the time the kid comes of age.

E: So basically zero. These pampers influencers simply created a new account.

I was going to say, this only stops children with no techie friends. Pirates use seedboxes already. Everyone else knows how to double hop.

You also don’t technically need DNS to access websites but even if you did the constant influx of fake slop and scam sites filling search results of Google and Bing should be some indication of the difficulty of maintaining and enforcing a blacklist.

But this is why many switch to new systems like IPFS or return to old ones like Usenet.

Yeah OP, skill ≥ talent. Rock on mon ami

Oh hey! I didn’t know you were the mod of !shitposting@lemmy.today Congratulations and thank you for banning all of your critics and deleting all of our comments.

Thank you!

You’ve already been told why. You’ve dumped so much low quality Reddit content here so indiscriminately that even if you never slept you’ve averaged 1 post per 34 seconds since account creation.

That is not organic posting by any stretch. Knock it tf off.