Next to upvoting, I’m just writing this to potentially get your comment ranked higher for this post.

I may be missing the point, but why not instead list names in whatever order, but clarify who contributed what.

Maybe to add, after having read some of the linked comments, that the survey is cool and all but that’s it. It triggers people to explain their process of how they tried to spot things (as good experiment participants should), but I have only seen one comment on the purpose and methodology (as a researcher would). For whatever interesting research question, the data selection doesn’t allow for insightful answers. We can interpret these results as we want, and as we can see, people are already taking what they want from it. Sincerely, Reviewer 2

I got a 9, while even knowing the two examples in this post, marking way too many as AI generated. But it got me thinking, seeing the deviantart links for the non-AI images: though maybe those are not generated by single prompts, there is a chance of heavy AI involvement in the process, one way or another. So I would actually be curious what the practical/applicable purpose of the survey was.