I agree.

I think it is a side effect if it runs on a modern Os. But honestly who cares…

I have made experiences with annoying PHP devs and I don’t hate them.

My critic wasn’t towards rust devs or any devs of any language but towards idolization of a language instead of studying the nature of those languages the flaws and advantages and use the best tool available or attempting to create a better tool.

I see your perspective and I think you kinda miss my perspective which I am to blame for.

I don’t say there weren’t improvements. I am saying that given the uncertainty of “goodness”. Maybe we shouldn’t idolize it. You can appreciate the attempt of creating memory safe code through a programing language without thinking the bare metal code should be written in that language. You can like a typeless easy to write language like Js without thinking desktop app should be written in it. You can like the idea behind functional programming while believing that any application is in the end about side effects and therefore a purely functional application impossible.

You can approach the whole topic as an area of study and possible technological advances instead of a dogma.

There have been “improvements” but fundamentally in my perspective, these “improvements” could be revealed to be a mistake down the line.

Assembly has produced some insane pieces of software that couldn’t be produced like that with anything else.

Maybe types in programming languages are bad because they are kinda misleading as the computer doesn’t even give a shit about what is data and what is code.

Maybe big projects are just a bad idea in software development and any kind of dependency management is the wrong way.

I like modern languages, types and libraries are nice to have, but I am not the student of the future but of the past.

I am proud of you and wish you happiness in your little corner of this world.

It is so weird when people idolize programming languages. They are all flawed and they all encourage some bad design patterns. Just chill and pick yours.

Privatized networks are a crime and it should be treated legally as such.

Public network for the public.

Out of curiosity towards your moral model, as you seem comfortable with person A killing person B because person B doesn’t give you the rights that you want to have. Does that mean that you would be fine if someone killed you because you don’t grant Palestinians the right to live? Just wondering.

These posts are motivating

Understandable and same. I just see the why. I don’t like it either.

I thought the same thing but honestly I understand them from a uninformed casual observer perspective.

American politics are very contrarian.

Technically 0% of their problems and 100% of their former problems.

That is the good kind of conditional love; condition is “love yourself and work towards a better tomorrow”

Okay, you might actually don’t understand, musk owns one of the biggest social media and musk stated that on the platform the word “cis” is considered a slur. Now you might think what does that have to do with trans people if he is against the word “cis”. Well his daughter is trans-gender and musk insist that the woke mob killed his son as he refuses to acknowledge his daughter. His daughter doesn’t want any relation at all with her father. He keeps deadnaming her. So it is fair to assume the he isn’t very supportive of his daughter. So to sum it up, he is so against trans that the idea of being cis (so the opposite of trans) is too much of an acknowledgement of transgender people.

So why does he matter? Like I said, owner of X, Restricting the speech of many people because of he is too sensitive to handle cis due to his fear(?)/disgust(?) for trans.

So trans people are faced with the reality that some of the most powerful people on the planet are so much of a fucking snowflake and so much against their existence that even “cis” is a problem for them.

That is a good reason to be “annoying” by protest and ridicule these people.

Now musk is only one person but it isn’t particularly difficult to find many many more.

Trans: e.g. because a lot of people, including people like Elon musk, lose their shit when presented to the idea that if trans-people are trans, that he, as an non-trans-person, is the opposite of trans which is cis.

Free speech absolutist…

Never donate if you don’t have the money. You can put a imaginary bill in an imaginary jar and turn those imaginary bills in real ones once you get better off.

Thanks for caring but care for yourself first.

When did I or anyone talked about more than 6 figures? We talked about who got the money and in my comment, I made clear that “a lot of it” went to dickheads. so I thought it was obvious that i wasn’t talking about “6 figures”.

And also musk was legally required to buy the stocks… It was hardly a gamble. At least not a pony. It would have been a reasonable expectation that people will drive up the price because Elon (that genius) talked himself in a prison sentence if he didn’t buy it for that price, like a genius would do.

I am aware. That is how stocks work. The billions “lost” got paid to previous owners of the stock.

I used “owning” instead of “owned”, sorry, I guess.

A Twitter stock was $34 in early 2022 and got bought by musk for $53.70 in late 2022.

You could have made $20 with a $34 investment. There were certainly some good people who invested maybe $340 and made $200.