I have thought for a long time that the chaos is the point. They’re not trying to do something strategically smart. They are trying to diminish the credibility of the US. They are corruptly manipulating US markets with big crazy moves as a means of transferring wealth to their friends while also trying to weaken the US.
They started small to see what they could get away with and have been progressively getting more wild with the moves they make.
Was it ever? Also, haven’t they been sued for this before?
Because the post specified code from 1969.
Fortran 66 isn’t too bad. You have to write everything yourself but if you’re just maintaining it is normally fine. Gotos get annoying, though!
You believe that North Korea actually is electrified but they just avoid light pollution? They are among the least electrified countries in the world.
How many defense contractors contributed to the ballroom?
100% agreed. This junk does nothing but make us look dumb. It’s just bad rage bait.
It seems like, while labels are important for communication, they are just unable to capture all of the nuance when it comes to sexuality and gender.
You should read about what ultra-processed means before spreading misinformation. In fact, ZERO of the examples you gave make something fall into the Nova “ultra-processed” classification. Each of those would place them in the category “processed”.
Processed foods are relatively simple food products produced by adding processed culinary ingredients (group 2 substances) such as salt or sugar to unprocessed (group 1) foods.
Processed foods are made or preserved through baking, boiling, canning, bottling, and non-alcoholic fermentation. They often use additives to enhance shelf life, protect the properties of unprocessed food, prevent the spread of microorganisms, or make them more enjoyable.
Examples include cheese, canned vegetables, salted nuts, fruits in syrup, and dried or canned fish. Breads, pastries, cakes, biscuits, snacks, and some meat products fall into this group when they are made predominantly from group 1 foods with the addition of group 2 ingredients.
I agree with you. The problem is that lawsuits cost money. Fighting the company on this requires the right plaintiff who is willing to risk money on the problem.
I agree with you that this should be illegal. I expect this was in the terms of service, though. Since we have no laws restricting this kind of bullshit, the company can argue that they’re within their rights.
We need some real legislation around privacy. It’s never going to happen, but it needs to. We need a right to anonymity but that is too scary for advertisers and our police state.
This is the weirdest way to say this. What a weird bot.
I was going to make a snarky comment about this obviously being true due to different infrastructure priorities in the EU vs the US. The article is right, though, about the deficiencies in US auto standards and their likely impact if applied to Europe.
Oh, I have no doubt that the Leavitt’s might use ICE as a weapon against someone inconvenient. The article makes nothing clear, though.
Maybe not even that. Former girlfriend of Leavitt’s brother? Former one-night-stand of Leavitt’s brother? The article is unclear in a way that is either purposeful or ignorant. I’m not sure which.
The woman is Leavitt’s nephew’s mother but is estranged from her child. She has no real relationship to Leavitt.
The real story here is that she was a DACA kid with one arrest for battery, the legal outcome of which is unclear. Obviously “the worst of the worst”.
Spell checking for this comment coming to you from Microsoft
Two questions:
This may be more pronounced, but this has been going on for at least 15 years and probably longer. I only say 15 years because that is how long I have been working with satellite imagery that easily shows these boundaries. They show up as obvious lines of light in nighttime visible satellite imagery.