She’s being racist AF but it’s indeed something approaching a logical conclusion, just not the one she’s intending. After reading all the hate that one transracial woman got years ago, I realized it sounded an awful lot like the standard TERF rehoritic. Gener is a construct, and so is race. The existence of transgender people almost necessitates the existence of transracial people. I’d love to hear a counter argument, because I’m not sure a good one exists…

1. The nearest two hitches are pixel-perfect square to the camera.
2. The tailpipe on the first truck on the right melts into a smudge.
3. There is almost no detail in the concrete even though all the trucks are in sharp focus.
4. All shadows have an ethereal quality and the light seems to have an inconsistent directionality.
5. The ball on the white truck melts into the white line behind it.
6. The green truck behind the white truck has a fender that seems to melt into a wheel.
7. The box on the orange truck on the left seems to be about 3’ deep.

Lol. I encourage you to zoom in and look at the details.

What in the GPT is going on with the hitches in the distance?

The protection is understood to basically be by them from them, in the event you don’t pay. If you pay, things are good. If you don’t, they’ll make sure things are not good.

Is it?

If only there were a huge trove of nutrient dense biscuits nearby. Too bad that one that did exist was incinerated by the Tump regime just days ago. A tragic coincidence I’m sure. /s

I suppose we’re about to find out if these things (LLMs) are any good at extrapolation. I expect not really as they’re effectively just interpolation machines.

Either I missed it or they added it.

It’s kid-approved!

You’re off by 3 orders of magnitude… Retracted.

I’m not CS smart enough to understand this… 😢

Plrase please please do this

I would usually agree with this kind of normalization, but in this case I actually think it would actually obfuscate the picture. Safer roads are a good thing, but if traffic deaths are reduced because more people bike or take the train, that’s still a win. Roads and cars are inherently dangerous, and that danger needs to be minimized using multiple strategies. We need to focus on holistic changes that consider people’s behaviour and their interactions with the built environment.

When people feel they absolutely need to drive, that’s a failure of infrastructure.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?

Ah yes, the shelling of a desperate crowd to bring order. Makes sense… /s

You really need to clean your fireplace