

Even if they do the get the signatures, it will be a huge uphill fight in the public vote. The strange part is that the public are more open to the idea than you’d think. Within the S-Bahn ring (the area proposed to turn into a pedestrianized zone), only about 10% of all trips are taken via private car. It’s an astonishingly low number for a modern city. A very large portion of the populace truly do live here without using a car for the majority of trips.
Would a more moderate plan likely do better? I’m not sure. Germany is heavily burdened by an older voting population pulling Boomer-like approaches to “don’t change anything, I liked how it was in the 1970’s” kinds of policies. I’d almost rather have a big vision be put forth instead of a weak center right one. Most of the polls show that once you put forward strong leftist/socialist ideals there’s more support available than you think, but it’s got to be big enough to get the younger populace to actually think you’re on their side for once.















It’s rated as one of the best (sometimes the best) public transit system for a small->medium sized US city. That doesn’t stop the city council from continuing to annex every stupid exurb they can be bribed into taking on.
One of the exurbs they pulled in recently has 10m (32ft) wide roads! That’s in a neighborhood of houses. It’s not some freeway. In fact, it’s around a 3 lane freeway wide. Roads designed for people to drive 60mph, three semi trucks wide are about how wide the residential streets are. The sheer amount of pavement that introduces to take care of for a handful of houses is crazy.
A quick measurement that it has a total of 1.6km of linear road. That’s just over 4 acres of asphalt to maintain. All of that for a mere 76 houses. That’s 1/10 of an acre per house. The road maintenance alone will eat up about 30% of the property tax revenue from these homes. There’s no way the neighborhood will be a net zero on revenue for the city. It’ll be a huge revenue sink for now and forever more.