People defend it because they actually like the instagram culture and they don’t dislike the data collection. So they see our staunch opposition as a condemnation of the things they like and they get defensive. Some are bootlickers too, who just love defending corporate actions for some reason.
Yes, real discrimination from religious freaks who thinks LGBTQ folk shouldn’t exist is equally as bad as petty revenge to point out the reality of the bigotry they want
I think this is beyond passive lol. And this is the future the Supreme Court clearly wants 🤷♀️
I thought kbin calls them magazines and lemmy calls them communities
Hey now, that’s Adam Driver slander
The first non-fiction book I read for fun is probably still my favorite. I used to hate nonfiction books, but randomly picked up Dead Mountain: The Untold True Story of the Dyatlov Pass Incident one day. A group of experienced mountain climbers died on a Russian mountain in very mysterious circumstances, leading to all kinds of wild theories from the KGB to the supernatural.
The author essentially becomes a detective, and the book alternates between his experience piecing together the mystery and the journal entries of the group that died. It’s fascinating and was impossible to put down.
It sparked my love of non-fiction and I have since read dozens of others. I left the book a glowing review on goodreads and the author actually liked my review, I fangirled for a bit ngl.
hmm I received this comment in my inbox but didn’t get anything from the post. Also I can’t access your first link, not sure which end the issue is on