Because arming yourself after your neighbor was invaded TWICE. Is not your fault? You’re not the one doing anything but be responsible and reasonable.

I’m definitely gonna pirate it

Right? People act like the Soviet Union was against nazis.

They literally tried to ally with them. They’ll tell you Stalin didn’t like Hitler, so fuckin what? Stalin didn’t even like his fellow Russians ffs. Dude was a piece of shit

One time when I was 10 my PS2 wouldn’t work so I threatened to punch it if it didn’t work again. It didn’t work so I punched it. Then it worked.

Weak answer. Learn how to talk to people and grow up ffs.

Who would ever think there are too many? The hell you trying to do go to bed early? I’d rather never have to eat or sleep, hate detailing myself and following some sick schedule society decided for me

When I lived in a place with shared laundry space I tried for a year to basically focus one machine that I tried to care about secretly so it didn’t get over used when people noticed it was better. Started off very gross, I tried a few different store bought items meant to clean your washer which helped a little and I’d empty out the dryer lint. It just sucked was very gross.

After a year I went to a Laundromat and just used there. Much better. Look for places with an attendant or employee working. Best advice I can give you.

As for the wool, idk man check YouTube?

Why is it whenever I see your comments you’re being a little pants pisser. I just do not understand what your problem is. You must be the most miserable person I’ve ever seen on lemmy.

Yogthos is such a stupid person I literally can’t believe how anyone takes them seriously. He’s been saying this for genuinely YEARS

He’s like those trump supporters waiting for “the kraken” with that whole Sydney Powell shit. I remember a guy who had fuck Joe Biden on his roof in Christmas lights and then had a sign in his yard that said “RELEASE THE KRAKEN”

6 years later the kraken sign is down and you can still see the outline of fuck Joe Biden on his roof from where the sun and rain wore on the more exposed parts.

Fucking loser that guy is.

Macron has been president for almost a decade. And the guy before him was even worse I can’t remember his name but I remember him threatening to absolutely ban demonstrations of any kind. Macron was seen as a new kinder president who was gonna hear the people.

It’s just not true. Protesting is fine but people are genuinely delusional thinking they work as effectively as people believe. The media tries its best to portray them as negative and effective because that placates people the right way. It supports those who think antifa are terrorists and gets the other side to think they don’t have to vote or engage because they protested.

It’s literally like some MkUltra shit and you can see it in how angry people get when you point it out and how ineffective they’ve been.

I mean I think this is kind of expected. Ignorance doesn’t change overnight. The age of Internet rage is definitely part of the information dispersal, people are confronted with a confusing reality that doesn’t match the one they want or believe. Religion is down, polarizing opinions are up, fake and misinformed information abound. What did we expect?

Agreed

It doesn’t as much as people believe. France still raised their retirement and pension ages even after mass protests. Call it anti protestism or whatever but here in America it’s not doing what people believe it does. Most protests here are pats on their back and aren’t doing enough.

It’s not anti protestism whatever to point out the ineffectiveness of it. That’s just called the truth.

Everyone praises French protesting but the French are literally still like the top 5 of imperialist countries in the world and more often than not their protests don’t change much externally.

Just food for thought when everyone considers dumping everything into protesting.

Lmfao I forgot about that one. Jeez

I think that’s a perverted way to view it.

As of right now private companies benefit from imprisoning people so they lobby to keep certain laws and retain an abundance of prisoners from petty crimes. On top of more private industries benefitting from selling military grade tech to police forces.

People being forced to provide free labor as an alternative to the death penalty is the lesser problem in the face of that.

While I’d agree it is slavery. There are definitely some people I think deserve to have their rights entirely restricted forever and contribute to society with the understanding they will never benefit from it themselves which sure you can call slavery but I think most would refer to it as a form of punishment and service.

Lol okay buddy.

AI is literally a fantastic pattern recognition technology and has the ability to take complex information and visualize it in ways a human mind cannot. Those are pretty useful.

Not sure how you think what he’s doing is critihype. Never put any words in your mouth. Don’t understand why the headline, Bernie didn’t write, has to be changed when everything he said is pretty true.

You did imply AI is useless you literally just reaffirmed that calling it boring. Never jumped to any conclusion, the conclusion I came to was that your perspective is goofy and literally matches the AI is both bad and dangerous. A bubble is dangerous.

Because they’re saying dumb things and unfortunately holding hands and being shy about someone’s straight lack of thinking doesn’t really get people to see the point. The comments in this section state:

• Bernie is both not doing his job(he is) and benefitting from this/AI

-AI is both bad and worthless but also dangerous and Bernie is dumb for trying to do anything (complete fallacy of the weak/dangerous threat kind, the enemy is both weak but dangerous. Silly)

-Absolutely fake claims like the one above.

So the whole comment section is just rife with stupidity. Stupid isn’t even a bad word.

Back to what you said. I literally don’t understand why you act like it says stock changes anything or anything about what I said? Literally useless points you keep highlighting. Nothing is made more clear by whatever you’re trying to say.

Donald Trump already had the upper hand he doesn’t care about the rule of law. Dunno why you’re viewing this like game of thrones.

Bernie Sanders wants the wealth amassed by these AI companies which have stolen data and work of billions of people across generations to be handed back to the people. His strategy is to tax the STOCK (not sure why we’re bolding it but sure I’ll play along). He is following the regular ruling that stands for creating panels, legislative bodies, committee establishment process. The president nominates THE SENATE CONFIRMS(because you glossed over that part) this is literally the standard practice.

So I don’t understand what you think you’re making clear or how what he’s doing is wrong here. He’s following the rules and wants to tax the stock of companies that have taken advantage of Americans. It literally makes complete sense and is nothing like what the comment above claims.

The comment above suggests the government will own the stock? Or something ridiculous and Bernie wants to give that power to the president. Which is what I imagine an insane person’s interpretation of that article might be if they didn’t know anything about government functions or something. So in conclusion, it’s a very stupid interpretation.